http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/nissan/...s-peugeot-3008
Nissan Qashqai vs SEAT Ateca vs Peugeot 3008
48
The Nissan Qashqai faces a fight to regain its crossover crown from the Peugeot 3008 and SEAT Ateca
The Qashqai started something in the UK. There had been crossovers before it, but none of them captured the car-buying public’s attention like the Nissan did. This was a model that offered the practicality and appeal of a 4x4, but without the premium price tag, and drivers snapped up Qashqais in their droves.
However, since the original car launched in 2006 the market has moved on at a ferocious pace. While the second-generation model brought more svelte styling and extra tech, it, too, was getting a little long in the tooth compared with the best cars in the class.
• Best SUVs for sale
So Nissan has gone back to the drawing board with this facelift, injecting an extra hint of upmarket charm and more modern tech, combined with the same qualities that have made the Qashqai such a hit. Efficiency, practicality, affordability, refinement, driving dynamics, performance – a family crossover has to cover all these bases
We put the Nissan up against our favourite mid-size SUV, the Peugeot 3008, and the talented SEAT Ateca. So are some mild cosmetic tweaks, a revised infotainment system, plusher interior trim and extra safety kit enough to take the Qashqai back to the top of this class?
Nissan Qashqai
Image 2 of 48
Image 2 of 48
The success for Nissan, but with newer, more modern rivals eroding the car’s appeal, this new version aims to put it back to the top of the class. Here we test a £25,555 N-Connecta 1.5 dCi model.
The Qashqai’s familiar hardware has been slightly retuned with different spring and damper rates to soften the chassis and improve comfort.
While the difference is marginal, it is noticeable, because the Qashqai feels a bit more compliant over choppy roads, with the suspension absorbing and controlling wheel movements better than before. However, it doesn’t deliver the level of comfort on offer in the 3008, and it’s not as agile as the Ateca.
Image 6 of 48
Image 6 of 48
The car’s anti-roll bar is actually stiffer, to retain composure in corners, but the Nissan isn’t very involving to drive. There’s very little connection to what’s going on at the road surface through the steering, while it doesn’t feel as alert and responsive as its rivals, despite the Qashqai’s dynamic tweaks.
These changes include a retuned Intelligent Ride Control system, which is said to reduce body motion over big bumps, plus Intelligent Trace Control, which applies the brakes to certain wheels in corners to help the car keep a tighter line.
Nissan’s venerable 108bhp 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel engine is the least powerful of the three and also offers less torque than the Peugeot, at 260Nm. This deficit showed on test, where the Qashqai trailed the Ateca from 0-60mph by more than one second, taking 11.6 seconds.
Image 12 of 48
Image 12 of 48
The outcome was the same during our in-gear tests, where the Nissan was 1.3 seconds slower than the 3008 between 30 and 50mph in fourth, and lagged by 2.2 seconds between 50 and 70mph in sixth. The gearbox also isn’t as sweet as the SEAT’s, with less precision and a woollier feeling to the shift.
Testers’ notes: “The 1.5 dCi engine has been developed for years and, thanks to improvements here, it is extremely refined. It’s quieter than the SEAT’s 1.6 TDI and nearly matches the 3008’s unit.”
Peugeot 3008
Image 3 of 48
Image 3 of 48
The 3008 has proven a big hit for Peugeot. It’s our favourite mid-size SUV, and here we test the £26,125 1.6 BlueHDi 120 model in mid-spec Allure trim (our pictures show a GT Line) to match the Qashqai.
The 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel is the punchiest unit here, with 118bhp and 300Nm of torque. This showed during our test because the 3008 served up strong in-gear acceleration at the track.
It took a relatively sprightly 11.8 seconds to accelerate between 50 and 70mph in sixth gear, which was 3.2 seconds faster than the Ateca and 2.2 seconds quicker than the Qashqai. This advantage was reinforced in the lower gears between 30 and 50mph, where the 3008 took 3.9 seconds to complete this test in third.
Image 20 of 48
Image 20 of 48
However, the six-speed manual transmission isn’t as willing or as open to fast changes as the SEAT’s more mechanically precise box, which explains the slightly slower 10.8-second 0-60mph time, although it was still eight tenths quicker than the Qashqai.
Outright performance isn’t what these cars are about, and the flexibility provided by the 3008’s extra torque is more welcome. So is the unit’s refinement compared with the SEAT’s noisier engine.
Neither of its rivals delivers as much comfort as the 3008, either. Helped by the EMP2 platform, the damping is plusher. The Peugeot still gets upset by larger, sharper bumps, but it’s less frenetic than the firm Ateca and controls body and wheel movement with more composure than the Qashqai, which tends to jolt over torn roads.
Image 26 of 48
Image 26 of 48
There is a downside, because the small steering wheel, quick steering and soft set-up mean the 3008 rolls a little in corners. It’s also not as quick to change direction, or as sharp through a series of bends as the SEAT, but on the motorway, around town and on sweeping roads the 3008’s ride and handling is well pitched for a family SUV.
Testers’ notes: “There’s some off-road ability, but no 4WD. Instead, you can spec Peugeot’s Grip Control function, which adds clever programming for the ESC to help on different surfaces.”
SEAT Ateca
Image 4 of 48
Image 4 of 48
The Ateca was SEAT’s first foray into the SUV market. There’s a larger off-roader on the way, but for now the Spanish manufacturer’s crossover debut is still breaking new ground for the firm. We test the 1.6 TDI in £24,330 SE Technology spec to see if it can beat its competitors here.
The SEAT isn’t as refined as the other cars on test, though. Its 113bhp 1.6 TDI is louder than the downsized diesels fitted to its rivals. With only 250Nm of torque (the least here), it also wasn’t as quick in gear at the test track. The Ateca took 15 seconds to accelerate between 50 and 70mph in sixth, although it was faster than the Nissan in the lower gears.
Good traction off the line and a lovely, precise six-speed manual transmission meant the Ateca was actually the fastest car over the 0-60mph benchmark sprint, clocking 10.4 seconds. The gearbox allows you to make up time going up the ratios, whereas you have to be slower and more methodical in the other models.
Image 34 of 48
Image 34 of 48
Along with the steering – which offers the nicest weighting and greatest connection to the car here – it’s the best choice if you value driver involvement above all else, but in this class comfort and refinement are likely to be more important.
The Ateca doesn’t hit the heights of the Peugeot here because the firmer set-up means you feel more from the road surface when on the move. It’s not as compliant over country roads, either, and while the SEAT retains good composure thanks to a level of grip that would rival a hatchback, it doesn’t smooth out broken surfaces as adeptly as the 3008.
The noisier engine also means the Ateca is less relaxing on a cruise, while the lack of torque only compounds this. You have to work the engine and gearbox harder, revving it more, so the diesel drone is all the more apparent.
Image 40 of 48
Image 40 of 48
Testers’ notes: “Unless you do lots of miles every year, a diesel might not be the best bet. All three cars here offer a downsized turbo petrol alternative that will be cheaper to buy.”
Verdict
First place: Peugeot 3008
Image 21 of 48
Image 21 of 48
The 3008 might be the priciest car here, however you buy it, but it delivers more for your money, especially now PCP deals have been published. It has a higher-quality feel, gets more kit than its rivals and it’s more spacious. Factor in the extra flexibility from the 1.6-litre diesel, which mixes this with an impressive level of refinement, and the Peugeot is the most complete mid-size SUV on sale.
Second place:SEAT Ateca
Image 35 of 48
Image 35 of 48
If you need practical family transport but still value driver appeal, the Ateca offers something over and above its rivals in this test. It’s affordable – especially on a monthly PCP deal – but the SEAT isn’t as comfortable nor as versatile as the Peugeot, and neither is it as advanced when it comes to infotainment, which is where many buyers engage with their cars.
Third place:Nissan Qashqai
Image 7 of 48
Image 7 of 48
This facelifted Qashqai feels like a missed opportunity for Nissan. The revisions aren’t major, so while the car is a little more comfortable and refined, it’s still lacking in too many areas given the ground rivals have made up. The infotainment feels well behind the 3008, while it trails both rivals for practicality. It’s efficient and refined, but so is the competition.
Other options in this category
Renault Kadjar
Image 47 of 48
Image 47 of 48
Price: £24,595
Engine: 1.5-litre 4cyl, 108bhp
The Renault Kadjar uses the same engine and chassis as the new Qashqai, but it’s not quite as refined or comfortable. However, it’s keenly priced and gets lots of kit – including a better infotainment system – in Dynamique S Nav trim.
Toyota C-HR
Image 48 of 48
Image 48 of 48
Price: £26,585
Engine: 1.8 petrol/electric, 120bhp
If you don’t want a diesel SUV, you could try a hybrid. The C-HR’s petrol/electric powertrain works well, but it is pricey. Still, you get lots of kit in Excel trim, such as sat-nav, a reversing camera and emergency braking with pedestrian protection.
Figures
Nissan Qashqai vs SEAT Ateca vs Peugeot 3008
48
The Nissan Qashqai faces a fight to regain its crossover crown from the Peugeot 3008 and SEAT Ateca
The Qashqai started something in the UK. There had been crossovers before it, but none of them captured the car-buying public’s attention like the Nissan did. This was a model that offered the practicality and appeal of a 4x4, but without the premium price tag, and drivers snapped up Qashqais in their droves.
However, since the original car launched in 2006 the market has moved on at a ferocious pace. While the second-generation model brought more svelte styling and extra tech, it, too, was getting a little long in the tooth compared with the best cars in the class.
• Best SUVs for sale
So Nissan has gone back to the drawing board with this facelift, injecting an extra hint of upmarket charm and more modern tech, combined with the same qualities that have made the Qashqai such a hit. Efficiency, practicality, affordability, refinement, driving dynamics, performance – a family crossover has to cover all these bases
We put the Nissan up against our favourite mid-size SUV, the Peugeot 3008, and the talented SEAT Ateca. So are some mild cosmetic tweaks, a revised infotainment system, plusher interior trim and extra safety kit enough to take the Qashqai back to the top of this class?
Nissan Qashqai
Image 2 of 48
Image 2 of 48
| Model: | Nissan Qashqai 1.5 dCi 110 N-Connecta |
| Price: | Price: £25,555 |
| Engine: | Engine: 1.5-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 108bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 11.6 seconds |
| Test economy: | 43.6mpg/9.6mpl |
| CO2: | 99g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £140 |
The success for Nissan, but with newer, more modern rivals eroding the car’s appeal, this new version aims to put it back to the top of the class. Here we test a £25,555 N-Connecta 1.5 dCi model.
The Qashqai’s familiar hardware has been slightly retuned with different spring and damper rates to soften the chassis and improve comfort.
While the difference is marginal, it is noticeable, because the Qashqai feels a bit more compliant over choppy roads, with the suspension absorbing and controlling wheel movements better than before. However, it doesn’t deliver the level of comfort on offer in the 3008, and it’s not as agile as the Ateca.
Image 6 of 48
Image 6 of 48
The car’s anti-roll bar is actually stiffer, to retain composure in corners, but the Nissan isn’t very involving to drive. There’s very little connection to what’s going on at the road surface through the steering, while it doesn’t feel as alert and responsive as its rivals, despite the Qashqai’s dynamic tweaks.
These changes include a retuned Intelligent Ride Control system, which is said to reduce body motion over big bumps, plus Intelligent Trace Control, which applies the brakes to certain wheels in corners to help the car keep a tighter line.
Nissan’s venerable 108bhp 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel engine is the least powerful of the three and also offers less torque than the Peugeot, at 260Nm. This deficit showed on test, where the Qashqai trailed the Ateca from 0-60mph by more than one second, taking 11.6 seconds.
Image 12 of 48
Image 12 of 48
The outcome was the same during our in-gear tests, where the Nissan was 1.3 seconds slower than the 3008 between 30 and 50mph in fourth, and lagged by 2.2 seconds between 50 and 70mph in sixth. The gearbox also isn’t as sweet as the SEAT’s, with less precision and a woollier feeling to the shift.
Testers’ notes: “The 1.5 dCi engine has been developed for years and, thanks to improvements here, it is extremely refined. It’s quieter than the SEAT’s 1.6 TDI and nearly matches the 3008’s unit.”
Peugeot 3008
Image 3 of 48
Image 3 of 48
| Model: | Peugeot 3008 1.6 BlueHDi 120 Allure |
| Price: | £26,125 |
| Engine: | 1.6-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 118bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 10.8 seconds |
| Test economy: | 44.1mpg/9.7mpl |
| CO2: | 104g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £140 |
The 3008 has proven a big hit for Peugeot. It’s our favourite mid-size SUV, and here we test the £26,125 1.6 BlueHDi 120 model in mid-spec Allure trim (our pictures show a GT Line) to match the Qashqai.
The 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel is the punchiest unit here, with 118bhp and 300Nm of torque. This showed during our test because the 3008 served up strong in-gear acceleration at the track.
It took a relatively sprightly 11.8 seconds to accelerate between 50 and 70mph in sixth gear, which was 3.2 seconds faster than the Ateca and 2.2 seconds quicker than the Qashqai. This advantage was reinforced in the lower gears between 30 and 50mph, where the 3008 took 3.9 seconds to complete this test in third.
Image 20 of 48
Image 20 of 48
However, the six-speed manual transmission isn’t as willing or as open to fast changes as the SEAT’s more mechanically precise box, which explains the slightly slower 10.8-second 0-60mph time, although it was still eight tenths quicker than the Qashqai.
Outright performance isn’t what these cars are about, and the flexibility provided by the 3008’s extra torque is more welcome. So is the unit’s refinement compared with the SEAT’s noisier engine.
Neither of its rivals delivers as much comfort as the 3008, either. Helped by the EMP2 platform, the damping is plusher. The Peugeot still gets upset by larger, sharper bumps, but it’s less frenetic than the firm Ateca and controls body and wheel movement with more composure than the Qashqai, which tends to jolt over torn roads.
Image 26 of 48
Image 26 of 48
There is a downside, because the small steering wheel, quick steering and soft set-up mean the 3008 rolls a little in corners. It’s also not as quick to change direction, or as sharp through a series of bends as the SEAT, but on the motorway, around town and on sweeping roads the 3008’s ride and handling is well pitched for a family SUV.
Testers’ notes: “There’s some off-road ability, but no 4WD. Instead, you can spec Peugeot’s Grip Control function, which adds clever programming for the ESC to help on different surfaces.”
SEAT Ateca
Image 4 of 48
Image 4 of 48
| Model: | SEAT Ateca 1.6 TDI Ecomotive SE Technology |
| Price: | £24,330 |
| Engine: | 1.6-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 113bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 10.4 seconds |
| Test economy: | 45.7mpg/10.1mpl |
| CO2: | 119g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £140 |
The Ateca was SEAT’s first foray into the SUV market. There’s a larger off-roader on the way, but for now the Spanish manufacturer’s crossover debut is still breaking new ground for the firm. We test the 1.6 TDI in £24,330 SE Technology spec to see if it can beat its competitors here.
The SEAT isn’t as refined as the other cars on test, though. Its 113bhp 1.6 TDI is louder than the downsized diesels fitted to its rivals. With only 250Nm of torque (the least here), it also wasn’t as quick in gear at the test track. The Ateca took 15 seconds to accelerate between 50 and 70mph in sixth, although it was faster than the Nissan in the lower gears.
Good traction off the line and a lovely, precise six-speed manual transmission meant the Ateca was actually the fastest car over the 0-60mph benchmark sprint, clocking 10.4 seconds. The gearbox allows you to make up time going up the ratios, whereas you have to be slower and more methodical in the other models.
Image 34 of 48
Image 34 of 48
Along with the steering – which offers the nicest weighting and greatest connection to the car here – it’s the best choice if you value driver involvement above all else, but in this class comfort and refinement are likely to be more important.
The Ateca doesn’t hit the heights of the Peugeot here because the firmer set-up means you feel more from the road surface when on the move. It’s not as compliant over country roads, either, and while the SEAT retains good composure thanks to a level of grip that would rival a hatchback, it doesn’t smooth out broken surfaces as adeptly as the 3008.
The noisier engine also means the Ateca is less relaxing on a cruise, while the lack of torque only compounds this. You have to work the engine and gearbox harder, revving it more, so the diesel drone is all the more apparent.
Image 40 of 48
Image 40 of 48
Testers’ notes: “Unless you do lots of miles every year, a diesel might not be the best bet. All three cars here offer a downsized turbo petrol alternative that will be cheaper to buy.”
Verdict
First place: Peugeot 3008
Image 21 of 48
Image 21 of 48
The 3008 might be the priciest car here, however you buy it, but it delivers more for your money, especially now PCP deals have been published. It has a higher-quality feel, gets more kit than its rivals and it’s more spacious. Factor in the extra flexibility from the 1.6-litre diesel, which mixes this with an impressive level of refinement, and the Peugeot is the most complete mid-size SUV on sale.
Second place:SEAT Ateca
Image 35 of 48
Image 35 of 48
If you need practical family transport but still value driver appeal, the Ateca offers something over and above its rivals in this test. It’s affordable – especially on a monthly PCP deal – but the SEAT isn’t as comfortable nor as versatile as the Peugeot, and neither is it as advanced when it comes to infotainment, which is where many buyers engage with their cars.
Third place:Nissan Qashqai
Image 7 of 48
Image 7 of 48
This facelifted Qashqai feels like a missed opportunity for Nissan. The revisions aren’t major, so while the car is a little more comfortable and refined, it’s still lacking in too many areas given the ground rivals have made up. The infotainment feels well behind the 3008, while it trails both rivals for practicality. It’s efficient and refined, but so is the competition.
Other options in this category
Renault Kadjar
Image 47 of 48
Image 47 of 48
Price: £24,595
Engine: 1.5-litre 4cyl, 108bhp
The Renault Kadjar uses the same engine and chassis as the new Qashqai, but it’s not quite as refined or comfortable. However, it’s keenly priced and gets lots of kit – including a better infotainment system – in Dynamique S Nav trim.
Toyota C-HR
Image 48 of 48
Image 48 of 48
Price: £26,585
Engine: 1.8 petrol/electric, 120bhp
If you don’t want a diesel SUV, you could try a hybrid. The C-HR’s petrol/electric powertrain works well, but it is pricey. Still, you get lots of kit in Excel trim, such as sat-nav, a reversing camera and emergency braking with pedestrian protection.
Figures
| Peugeot 3008 | SEAT Ateca | Nissan Qashqai | |
| On the road price/total as tested | £26,125/£26,125 | £24,330/£26,175 | £25,555/£25,555 |
| Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) | £10,701/41.0% | £11,374/46.8% | £10,526/41.2% |
| Depreciation | £15,424 | £12,956 | £15,029 |
| Annual tax liability std/higher rate | £1,141/£2,282 | £1,206/£2,412 | £1,066/£2,132 |
| Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) | £1,431/£2,385 | £1,381/£2,302 | £1,448/£2,413 |
| Ins. group/quote/road tax cost | 16/£638/£140 | 11/£540/£140 | 14/£707/£140 |
| Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service | £13 per month (3yrs) | £498 (3yrs) | £159/£249/£159 |
| Length/wheelbase | 4,447/2,675mm | 4,363/2,638mm | 4,394/2,646mm |
| Height/width | 1,620/1,841mm | 1,841/1,615mm | 1,590/1,806mm |
| Engine | 4cyl in-line/1,560cc | 4cyl in-line/1,598cc | 4cyl in-line/1,461cc |
| Peak power/revs | 118/3,500 bhp/rpm | 113/3,250 bhp/rpm | 108/4,000 bhp/rpm |
| Peak torque/revs | 300/1,750 Nm/rpm | 250/1,500 Nm/rpm | 260/1,750 Nm/rpm |
| Transmission | 6-spd man/fwd | 6-spd man/fwd | 6-spd man/fwd |
| Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel | 53 litres/yes | 50 litres/£110 | 55 litres/£215 |
| Boot capacity (seats up/down) | 591/1,670 litres | 510/1,604 litres | 430/1,598 litres |
| Kerbweight/payload/towing weight | 1,300/670/1,500kg | 1,375/535/1,700kg | 1,379/531/1,350kg |
| Turning circle | 10.7 metres | 10.8 metres | 10.7 metres |
| Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 3yrs (60,000)/1yr | 3yrs (60,000)/2yrs | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs |
| Service intervals/UK dealers | 10,000 (1yr)/283 | Variable/283 | 18,000 (1yr)/128 |
| Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 13th/9th | 6th/17th | 20th/25th |
| NCAP: Adult/child/ped./assist/stars | 86/85/67/58/5 | 93/84/71/60/5 | 88/83/69/79/5 |
| 0-60/30-70mph | 10.8/10.8 secs | 10.4/10.2 secs | 11.6/12.7 secs |
| 30-50mph in 3rd/4th | 3.9/6.3 secs | 4.2/6.4 secs | 5.0/7.6 secs |
| 50-70mph in 5th/6th/7th/8th | 8.8/11.8 secs | 10.4/15.0 secs | 10.8/14.0 secs |
| Top speed/rpm at 70mph | 117mph/1,900rpm | 114mph/1,900rpm | 113mph/2,000rpm |
| Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph | 46.5/33.0/11.4m | 44.5/33.4/8.4m | 52.2/34.6/10.3m |
| Noise outside/idle/30/70mph | 65/42/60/68dB | 67/44/60/68dB | 66/47/57/68dB |
| Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range | 44.1/9.7/514 miles | 45.7/10.1/503 miles | 43.6/9.6/527 miles |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 60.1/80.7/70.6mpg | 57.6/65.7/62.8mpg | 67.3/78.5/74.3mpg |
| Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 13.2/17.8/15.5mpl | 12.7/14.5/13.8mpl | 14.8/17.3/16.3mpl |
| Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket | 172/104g/km/22% | 166/119g/km/25% | 174/99g/km/21% |
| Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/camera | Six/yes/yes/yes | Seven/yes/yes/£220 | Six/yes/yes/yes |
| Auto box/stability/cruise control/AEB | £1,400/yes/yes/yes | No/yes/yes/yes | No/yes/yes/yes |
| Climate control/leather/heated seats | Yes/no/£560 | Yes/no/£325* | Yes/no/yes |
| Met paint/LED lights/keyless entry & go | £525/£850/£350 | £575/yes/£505 | £575/£495/yes |
| Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/yes |
Comentário