Dekra conclui ocupantes bancos traseiros carros reservatórios gás sofrem mais lesões
Basicamente a Dekra concluiu que os reservatórios de Gás montados por detrás dos bancos traseiros causaram maiores danos nos test dummies, tendo como base dois Vectras iguais, um com e outro sem.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/t...9604_13987.hbs
P.S. Não coloquei no tópico dos crash tests ser um artigo suficientemente diferenciado.
Natural gas enjoys of increasing popularity, therefore ever more plants are re-tooled. Whether the passengers in the car are endangered in an accident by the gasanlage examined, the DEK RA research on accidents now with a Heckcrashtest. The result is frightening. Well 1.8 tons a heavy, rigid carriage drives here with 48 km/h and to full cover from the rear against the test car, an OPEL Vectra caravan with re-tooled gas system. Thus a typical accident is placed behind to accumulating. Because it concerned the Dekra however not exclusively the examination of the tank tightness to an accident, the technicians in the back bank two adult dummies platzierten. For the heckaufprall the OPEL trunk was equipped with three compressed gas bottles, which formed the voluminoesesten part for that approximately 85 kilograms of heavy gasanlage. Now did the global vote of the OPEL safety system change? With the gasanlage on board that is clear the case. After the simulated back-up Karambolage was 40 centimeters imprinted the tail of the gas OPEL. An identical model without gasanlage was continued to compress together still ten centimeters with a comparable test against it.
Increased safety risk in the back bank The reinforced rear crunch zone could not convert so much energy with the gas car obviously, as this by OPELS with the construction of the Vectra was intended, but the results to show that with this test for the passengers sitting in front hardly a role played. Because the acceleration of the passenger space was only little higher with the gas car than with the standard Vectra. The DEK RA specialists assume with both cars a low injury risk exists for drivers and front seat passengers in so an accident. In the back bank the results differ against it dramatically: In the car with natural gas plant the dummies are much more strongly loaded. The acceleration of the dummy heads and basins is twice as high in the rear as in a standard Vectra, remains however in the uncritical range. The probability of heavy injuries for these body regions is almost impossible - an additional charge in the gas car, but a bearable? No. Because an exact view of the chest ratings shows extreme accelerations. With humans injuries at internal organs and fractured ribses would be to be expected. The accident researchers speak of a high risk for heavy or fatal injuries. The test makes clear with the fact that the assembly of the gas tanks can represent a life-threatening safety risk for the passengers sitting before it closely behind the back bank. The DEKRA experts sees here substantial development need.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/t...9604_13987.hbs
P.S. Não coloquei no tópico dos crash tests ser um artigo suficientemente diferenciado.
Natural gas enjoys of increasing popularity, therefore ever more plants are re-tooled. Whether the passengers in the car are endangered in an accident by the gasanlage examined, the DEK RA research on accidents now with a Heckcrashtest. The result is frightening. Well 1.8 tons a heavy, rigid carriage drives here with 48 km/h and to full cover from the rear against the test car, an OPEL Vectra caravan with re-tooled gas system. Thus a typical accident is placed behind to accumulating. Because it concerned the Dekra however not exclusively the examination of the tank tightness to an accident, the technicians in the back bank two adult dummies platzierten. For the heckaufprall the OPEL trunk was equipped with three compressed gas bottles, which formed the voluminoesesten part for that approximately 85 kilograms of heavy gasanlage. Now did the global vote of the OPEL safety system change? With the gasanlage on board that is clear the case. After the simulated back-up Karambolage was 40 centimeters imprinted the tail of the gas OPEL. An identical model without gasanlage was continued to compress together still ten centimeters with a comparable test against it.
Increased safety risk in the back bank The reinforced rear crunch zone could not convert so much energy with the gas car obviously, as this by OPELS with the construction of the Vectra was intended, but the results to show that with this test for the passengers sitting in front hardly a role played. Because the acceleration of the passenger space was only little higher with the gas car than with the standard Vectra. The DEK RA specialists assume with both cars a low injury risk exists for drivers and front seat passengers in so an accident. In the back bank the results differ against it dramatically: In the car with natural gas plant the dummies are much more strongly loaded. The acceleration of the dummy heads and basins is twice as high in the rear as in a standard Vectra, remains however in the uncritical range. The probability of heavy injuries for these body regions is almost impossible - an additional charge in the gas car, but a bearable? No. Because an exact view of the chest ratings shows extreme accelerations. With humans injuries at internal organs and fractured ribses would be to be expected. The accident researchers speak of a high risk for heavy or fatal injuries. The test makes clear with the fact that the assembly of the gas tanks can represent a life-threatening safety risk for the passengers sitting before it closely behind the back bank. The DEKRA experts sees here substantial development need.
Comentário