Topico dos Crash-Tests- Euro NCAP-29/05/202

[GTTDI]

IIHS
Crash test

Toyota Tundra crew cab
Ram 1500 crew cab
Ford F-150 crew cab

Large pickups offer strong side protection but falter in back seat safety
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/lar...ck-seat-safety

https://www.iihs.org/media/20e6cab4-...s_DJP_1392.jpg

[LinoMarques]

Cientificamente comprovado: implantes mamários de silicone podem reduzir risco de ferimentos em embates frontais:

https://www.bild.de/auto/auto-news/a...dicbo#fromWall

(Usar Google Translator do Chrome)

[GTTDI]

Audi 100 Auto Motor und Sport crash test safety comparison - 1992

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaiMUM0XVZk

x720.jpg

[Eagle88]

Crash test anos 90.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CzoBfJss...A0NG1mdTdza2p3

[LinoMarques]

Desempenho no crash-test como motivo de publicidade:

image.png

https://www.ebay.de/itm/225358619255

[GTTDI]

Mas só colocam o Vitara XL, pois o Vitara normal era apenas acceptable quando foi testado pelo IIHS, ficando visível que a carroçaria não aguentaria um impacto mais forte

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

Crash Test Mini Countryman 2023
NHTSA

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

Hyundai Ioniq 5
NHTSA crash test

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

2023 Mercedes GLE
NHTSA crash test

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

2023 Mercedes GLB NHTSA crash test

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

Este crash test é para o Lino Marques

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUtIbQh7Fxo

Crash test lateral Peugeot 306 fase 1

Peugeot 306 carrinha fase II vs lateral direita Peugeot 306 fase I

[GTTDI]

Mitsubishi Outlander 2023 Plug-in Hybrid
Latin Ncap crash test

https://www.globalncap.org/news/mits...hybrid-version



Mitusbishi+Outlander.jpg

The Outlander showed overall good performance, stable structures in frontal impact, with the footwell of the PHEV version showing slight worse performance than that of the ICE version.

After the assessment it was confirmed that the result of five stars published for the Outlander in 2022 is also valid for the Plug-in Hybrid version

[LinoMarques]

Este crash test é para o Lino Marques

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUtIbQh7Fxo

Crash test lateral Peugeot 306 fase 1

Peugeot 306 carrinha fase II vs lateral direita Peugeot 306 fase I

À parte o ambiente de brincadeira em que este gajo faz os vídeos e crash-tests, ele diz ali algumas coisas bem pertinentes, como o facto de o 306 fase I ter apresentado um péssimo resultado no embate lateral, efectuado a 50 km/h. Não há-de ter sido por acaso que com a chegada da carrinha, que coincidiu com a fase II, um dos melhoramentos tenha sido o reforço da estrutura lateral do carro. No Euro NCAP foi testado um fase II e na altura obteve umas razoáveis 3 estrelas nos embates frontal e lateral.

[GTTDI]

À parte o ambiente de brincadeira em que este gajo faz os vídeos e crash-tests, ele diz ali algumas coisas bem pertinentes, como o facto de o 306 fase I ter apresentado um péssimo resultado no embate lateral, efectuado a 50 km/h. Não há-de ter sido por acaso que com a chegada da carrinha, que coincidiu com a fase II, um dos melhoramentos tenha sido o reforço da estrutura lateral do carro. No Euro NCAP foi testado um fase II e na altura obteve umas razoáveis 3 estrelas nos embates frontal e lateral.

O Citroen ZX teria um comportamento semelhante, ao do 306 fase I no crash test lateral? Espanta-me e como a porta do passageiro entra no habitaculo, soltando-se do pilar

[GTTDI]

Desta vez um crash test em que um Peugeot 306 fase II embate, na lateral de um Clio MK1 fase 1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhbijKPkf0w

A intrusão lateral no Clio é bem superior a observada no crash test lateral do euroncap.Provavelmente a versao do CLio testada pelo Euroncap já era mais reforçada-

[GTTDI]

Crash test Peugeot 505
https://www.hemmings.com/stories/201...t-505-brochure


image.webp

image.webp

[PugGT]

Desta vez um crash test em que um Peugeot 306 fase II embate, na lateral de um Clio MK1 fase 1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhbijKPkf0w

A intrusão lateral no Clio é bem superior a observada no crash test lateral do euroncap.Provavelmente a versao do CLio testada pelo Euroncap já era mais reforçada-

Sempre tive duvidas nos carros testados no Euroncap, alguma versao reforçada p o teste.

[GTTDI]

Sempre tive duvidas nos carros testados no Euroncap, alguma versao reforçada p o teste.

O que estava a falar era no facto de o Clio MK1 testado pelo Euroncap, ser o restyling da versão usada pelos franceses no video. Ha um primeiro restyling em que alteraram os farois traseiros e um posterior, em que alterar os da frente

[GTTDI]

Crash test Auto Motor Und Sport
Comparativo VW Golf III, sem airbag vs eurobag e com airbag

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

Próximos resultados do Euroncap, serão publicados a 6 de Dezembro. Não se sabe e se são testes de segurança ativa ou passiva.

Possíveis candidatos a serem alvos de crash tests

Ford Transit. Connect
Mercedes Classe E
Mini

Os dois primeiros penso que já foram te testados, ao nível da segurança ativa pelo Euroncap

Enviado do meu SM-S908B através do Tapatalk

[GTTDI]

IIHS 2023 Kia Sportage crash test
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/kia...-iihs-accolade

120123.jpg

[GTTDI]

Mitsubishi Outlander’s 5 stars are extended to the Plug-in Hybrid version
https://www.globalncap.org/news/mits...hybrid-version






The New Car Assessment Programme for Latin America and the Caribbean, Latin NCAP, tested in December 2022 the Misubishi Outlander and achieved five stars. At that time only the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) version was available in the region. As the Plug-in Hybrid version (PHEV) entered the market, Latin NCAP has now tested it to confirm or not that both versions offer the same safety ratings.
The ICE and PHEV versions of the Mitsubishi Outlander have architectural differences due to the powertrain. Therefore, Latin NCAP performed again the frontal impact test as well as dynamic moose tests of the PHEV version for confirmation, which showed slight performance differences within the acceptable margins of Latin NCAP. The Adult Protection box was updated, however the model still robustly reaches the five stars requirements. The PHEV version of the Mitsubishi Outlander is Latin NCAP’s first ever test of a car fitted with a center airbag, a safety item already required in other markets like Europe and the US to reach good scores in local consumer tests and that Latin NCAP will consider for future assessments. The Mitsubishi Outlander made in Japan, achieved five stars. The Outlander with seven airbags (two frontal, one driver knee airbag, two side body and two side head curtain airbags) and Electronic Stability Control (ESC) as standard, achieved 87.11% in Adult Occupant, 91.33% in Child Occupant, 54.71% in Pedestrian Protection and Vulnerable Road Users and 84.17% in Safety Assist. The car was tested in frontal impact, side impact, side pole impact, whiplash, pedestrian protection, Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) city and interurban, Blind Spot Detection and ESC. The Outlander showed overall good performance, stable structures in frontal impact, with the footwell of the PHEV version showing slight worse performance than that of the ICE version. The model showed adequate to good protection in the crash tests and dynamic tests for adults and almost full protection for child occupants. The model was tested as a voluntary decision of the manufacturer. After the assessment it was confirmed that the result of five stars published for the Outlander in 2022 is also valid for the Plug-in Hybrid version.

[GTTDI]

Mitsubishi Outlander’s 5 stars are extended to the Plug-in Hybrid version
https://www.globalncap.org/news/mits...hybrid-version






The New Car Assessment Programme for Latin America and the Caribbean, Latin NCAP, tested in December 2022 the Misubishi Outlander and achieved five stars. At that time only the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) version was available in the region. As the Plug-in Hybrid version (PHEV) entered the market, Latin NCAP has now tested it to confirm or not that both versions offer the same safety ratings.

The ICE and PHEV versions of the Mitsubishi Outlander have architectural differences due to the powertrain. Therefore, Latin NCAP performed again the frontal impact test as well as dynamic moose tests of the PHEV version for confirmation, which showed slight performance differences within the acceptable margins of Latin NCAP. The Adult Protection box was updated, however the model still robustly reaches the five stars requirements. The PHEV version of the Mitsubishi Outlander is Latin NCAP’s first ever test of a car fitted with a center airbag, a safety item already required in other markets like Europe and the US to reach good scores in local consumer tests and that Latin NCAP will consider for future assessments.

The Mitsubishi Outlander made in Japan, achieved five stars. The Outlander with seven airbags (two frontal, one driver knee airbag, two side body and two side head curtain airbags) and Electronic Stability Control (ESC) as standard, achieved 87.11% in Adult Occupant, 91.33% in Child Occupant, 54.71% in Pedestrian Protection and Vulnerable Road Users and 84.17% in Safety Assist. The car was tested in frontal impact, side impact, side pole impact, whiplash, pedestrian protection, Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) city and interurban, Blind Spot Detection and ESC. The Outlander showed overall good performance, stable structures in frontal impact, with the footwell of the PHEV version showing slight worse performance than that of the ICE version. The model showed adequate to good protection in the crash tests and dynamic tests for adults and almost full protection for child occupants. The model was tested as a voluntary decision of the manufacturer. After the assessment it was confirmed that the result of five stars published for the Outlander in 2022 is also valid for the Plug-in Hybrid version.

[GTTDI]

2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 iihs crash test
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle...oor-sedan/2023

5868.jpg

5869.jpg


5871.jpg



5870.jpg

[GTTDI]

IIHS 2023 BMW X1 crash test
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle...-door-suv/2023

5786.jpg

[GTTDI]

Nissan X Trail 2023 Japan Ncap crash test
https://www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/en/as...#result_list02

256.jpg

[GTTDI]

BMW Serie 5 2023 Euroncap crash test
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/bmw/5+series/50186

bmw_5_series_2023_fw.jpg

bmw_5_series_2023_fw1.jpg

bmw_5_series_2023_md1.jpg

sideimpactpoleimage.pngSide Pole

The passenger compartment of the 5 Series remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for the front passenger and driver.

Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the 5 Series would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the 5 Series scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal on the basis of dummy readings of rib compression.

Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was good. The 5 Series has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in the pole impact test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The 5 Series has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions. BMW demonstrated that, if the car entered water, the doors and windows of the 5 Series would remain functional long enough to allow the occupants to escape.


The passenger compartment of the 5 Series remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for the front passenger and driver. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the 5 Series would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the 5 Series scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal on the basis of dummy readings of rib compression. Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was good. The 5 Series has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in the pole impact test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The 5 Series has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions. BMW demonstrated that, if the car entered water, the doors and windows of the 5 Series would remain functional long enough to allow the occupants to escape.

[GTTDI]

IIHS BMW Serie 5 2024 crash test
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle...oor-sedan/2024

Sem título-2.jpg

Excelente resultado na maior parte dos testes, excluindo no campo da iluminação e no impacto lateral, com a barreira que simula um suv
How the moderate overlap front test is conducted Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2024 models
Tested vehicle: 2024 BMW 530i 4-door
The BMW 5 series was redesigned for the 2024 model year. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2024 5 series conducted by BMW as part of side crash test verification.

Torso	A
Pelvis	A

[GTTDI]

Smart #3
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/smart/%233/50193




The #3 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. In Euro NCAP’s test, the heads of the driver and front passenger hit each and the protection was rated as poor

[GTTDI]

VinFast VF8 Euroncap crash test 2023


https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/vinfast/vf8/50194

vinfast_vf8_2023_md.png

In addition, the driver’s knee airbag deployed in a way that provided no protection to the inboard leg, attracting a further penalty.

The VF8 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. However, in Euro NCAP's test, the heads of the driver and front passenger made contact and protection was rated as poor.

However, the side curtain airbag deployed incorrectly, getting trapped on the interior trim, and a penalty was applied to the head. The same penalty was applied in the side pole test.