Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap- 10/10/2026

LinoMarques disse:
E não tens nada a dizer sobre as cadeirinhas? [;)]
Clique para expandir...

Meh, além de dar rios de dinheiro à Chicco etc., a maior utilidade deve ser atar os miúdos onde não vão mexer em nada e distrair o condutor.

Uma vez um, mesmo assim atado, conseguiu abrir-me a porta do carro na auto-estrada - eu tinha andado com visitas adultas no carro, e tinha desligado a desactivação dos puxadores, e esquecido de repor.

E em caso de acidentes, os pimpolhos parecem de borracha - os adultos partem-se todos e eles safam-se ilesos. Decerto que as cadeirinhas ainda melhoram as chances, por isso é que toda a gente alinha.

Agora sacar coisas em que os alemães estavam à frente em "avanços da civilização" é um desporto perigoso, ainda saem coisas da primeira metade do século XX como o naturismo e o vegetarianismo [:p]
 
NIO ET7 crash teste Chinese C-NCAP


image.png

Now, let’s talk about the vehicle occupants’ safety rating. In this segment, the ET7 had a frontal full width collision at a speed of 50 km/h. Then, the side pole impact was tested at a 32-km/h speed. The ET7 has also been tested by colliding with a mobile deformable barrier. In this test, the car and the barrier (with a weight of 1400 kg) were moving towards each other at a speed of 50 km/h. At last, CATARC has also evaluated the ET7’s whiplash seat assessment. As a result, the NIO ET7 reached 88.18% of safety in this test. We should underline that in the Euro NCAP program, this EV scored 91%.

For the vulnerable road users’ safety, the ET7 scored 77.15%. As for the safety assistance functions, the NIO’s flagship sedan performed better. Thanks to its effective AEB system and a LiDAR sensor, it has achieved 91.44%.
As for the final score of the NIO ET7, it is 87.3%. Its performance is impressive, so it has achieved those 5 stars pretty easily (the 5-star grade starts from 80%). The ET7’s safety performance is better than the Volkswagen ID3’s result that was also recently tested by CATARC.
​
 
LinoMarques disse:
Só que aqui com a grande agravante de transportar pessoas naquilo que é espaço de carga nos outros.
Clique para expandir...

Confesso que nunca andei de auto-caravana. É permitido transportar passageiros na "casa" enquanto a caravana circula? O bom-senso diz-me que os passageiros deveriam estar sempre na cabina e com cintos colocados sempre que o veículo está em andamento.
 
Já fiz uma viagem de autocaravana a França em que éramos 6 pessoas, e todos tinham o seu lugar com cinto de segurança. Daí que a concepção e a robustez dos bancos sejam extremamente importantes.
 
Crash Test Between US and Mexican Market Hyundais Shows How Much Safer Our Cars Are

A crash test with two Hyundai sedans from each side of the border shows just how different standards are around the world.

byLewin Day| PUBLISHED Jun 29, 2022 7:04 PM EDT

Car2Car-Test-demonstrates-zero-star-double-standard-on-vehicle-safety-1-57-screenshot.jpg

YouTube/Global NCAP Share

https://www.thedrive.com/news/us-market-cars-are-far-safer-than-mexican-models-test-reveals

A new video released by Global NCAP shows a crash test between two Hyundai cars sold in the US and Mexico respectively. It demonstrates the stark contrasts in vehicle safety standards around the world, as spotlighted by Motor1.

Representing the US market is a Hyundai Accent, while the Mexican market car is a Hyundai Grand i10. The two vehicles are the cheapest sedans sold by Hyundai in their respective countries. The US market car features 6 airbags and electronic stability control, a stark contrast to the Mexican market car which only features two frontal airbags.

The two vehicles were accelerated towards each other in a head-on crash test, with the cars colliding with a small overlap on the driver's side. The aftermath of the crash shows a major difference in how well the passengers in each car are protected.

Car2Car-Test-demonstrates-zero-star-double-standard-on-vehicle-safety-2-31-screenshot.jpg



The Mexican market Hyundai Grand i10 shows serious damage after the crash, demonstrating significant risk of injury to the passengers. In the Mexican market Grand i10, the body shell shows significant deformation after the impact. The A-pillar is badly bent and the driver's door is crumpled, while the steering wheel has also been pushed back towards the driver. There's also little protection from the sides as only frontal airbags are fitted. "The level of protection in the occupant zone is really rather poor, with a high risk of fatal or serious injury," said David Ward, Executive President of Global NCAP.

In contrast, the American market Accent sedan performed much better. While the front end has still taken serious damage, the occupant cell itself is far more intact. The door appears almost unblemished and would open a lot more easily than its Mexican counterpart. The A-pillar looks untouched, and even the windscreen survived without major damage. "The body shell has really performed well," notes Ward.

Car2Car-Test-demonstrates-zero-star-double-standard-on-vehicle-safety-2-36-screenshot.jpg



While the US market Hyundai Accent also shows heavy front-end damage, the occupant area is more intact, with the passengers inside much less likely to be seriously harmed. The difference between the two is stark and comes down to the different vehicle safety regulations in each country. Alejandro Furas, Secretary General for Global NCAP, believes that educating consumers about vehicle safety is key, such as publicizing star ratings for crash safety. "We believe that if in Mexico, we have much more powerful and much broader consumer information... the gap will be much smaller," says Furas.

It's a test that reveals just how far automotive safety has come for markets with the most stringent regulations, like the US and EU. It's something to think about if you're riding in car in places that don't subscribe to rigorous safety standards. Fundamentally, it shows that market forces and government regulations are key to pushing automakers to improve safety. The technology exists; all that's needed is the will to implement it on a global scale.


​
 
A4B5 disse:
Meh, além de dar rios de dinheiro à Chicco etc., a maior utilidade deve ser atar os miúdos onde não vão mexer em nada e distrair o condutor.



E em caso de acidentes, os pimpolhos parecem de borracha - os adultos partem-se todos e eles safam-se ilesos. Decerto que as cadeirinhas ainda melhoram as chances, por isso é que toda a gente alinha.
Clique para expandir...

Um gajo lê com cada barbaridade por esta internet fora que até fica meio zonzo [:)][:)]:sh)
 
IIHS Small pickups struggle in new crash test
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/small-pickups-fall-short-when-it-comes-to-rear-seat-safety

Nissan Frontier
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Nissan/frontier-crew-cab-pickup/2023

Ford Ranger
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/ford/ranger-crew-cab-pickup/2023

Chevrolet Colorado
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/chevrolet/colorado-crew-cab-pickup/2022

Jeep Gladiator
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/jeep/gladiator-crew-cab-pickup/2023

Toyota Tacoma Crew Cab
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/tacoma-crew-cab-pickup/2023

​Ratings in updated moderate overlap front test: small pickups [TABLE="class: rating-cards table"]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Vehicle"]2022-23 Nissan Frontier crew cab[/TD]
[TD="class: is-primary"]A[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Vehicle"]2022-23 Ford Ranger crew cab[/TD]
[TD="class: is-primary"]M[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]P[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Vehicle"]2022 Chevrolet Colorado crew cab[/TD]
[TD="class: is-primary"]P[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Vehicle"]2022-23 Jeep Gladiator[/TD]
[TD="class: is-primary"]P[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]A[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[TD]P[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]A[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: Vehicle"]2022-23 Toyota Tacoma crew cab[/TD]
[TD="class: is-primary"]P[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]A[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]P[/TD]
[TD]P[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]M[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
  • G Good
  • A Acceptable
  • M Marginal
  • P Poorimagem.png zz0.zhlnuwj3e1zz





​
 
Deve fazer início de sessão ou registar-se para responder aqui.
Voltar
Superior