Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap -2 Setembro 2026
- Thread starter GTTDI
- Start date
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Um bocado exagerado, porventura, mas ok. [
]
]Um bocado exagerado, porventura, mas ok. [
Os primeiros citadinos tiveram bastante s dificuldades no crash test do Euroncap, mas também é preciso analisar que o Rover 100 testado, era um restyling do 1 Rover 100, que já era um restyling, de um carro do inicio da década de 80 o MG Metro.
"O último Rover 100 saiu da linha de montagem ao fim de 17 anos de sobrevivência. Foi lançado em 1980 com o nome Metro e proposto pela Austin com "o" sucessor do Mini, apesar de estar longe de poder ser considerado inovador. Mesmo assim, em 1983 foi eleito "Carro do Ano" (na versão desportiva MG) pela conceituada revista britânica "What Car?".
O tempo passou e a situação do Grupo Rover agudizou-se, mas o modelo foi sendo um "best seller" até ser condenado pela Euro NCAP, que considerou que o Rover 100, a última evolução do "dinossauro", estava longe de responder às exigências mínimas de segurança passiva. O relatório foi tão arrasador, que fez manchetes em todos os jornais, ecoadas pelas antenas da BBC. Em face disto, as encomendas caíram a pique e a Rover foi obrigada a retirar o carro do seu catálogo."
https://www.aquelamaquina.pt/efemerides/detalhe/hoje-ha-19-anos-o-ultimo-rover-100.html
Segundo a wikipedia em termos de segurança passiva, o restyling de 1995 do Rover 100 incluia
"The only safety efforts came in the form of an optional drivers airbag, an alarm, a passive engine immobiliser, a removable radio keypad, central locking and side intrusion beams."
" End of the line
In 1997, the Rover 100 gave a poor performance in Euro NCAP crash tests[SUP][22][/SUP] (despite the improved safety features, including side impact bars in the doors and an optional driver's airbag, the 1970s design was showing its age) – it was at the time the only car tested to receive a one-star Adult Occupant Rating. Other small cars tested at the same time received two or three stars out of five. The passenger compartment was subjected to severe structural damage in the frontal-offset test and results showed a high risk of injury to all body regions for the driver. Meanwhile, the side impact test also showed high injury risks.
The Rover 100's dismal safety showing was not its only problem by 1997. It was fast falling behind the best cars in its sector when it came to design, build quality, refinement and specification, although it remained strong in terms of fuel economy and affordability. Unlike the Ford Fiesta, Volkswagen Polo and Vauxhall Corsa, the Rover 100 could still provide sub-£7,000 motoring.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP]
"
Last edited:
Nissan Qashqai update Novembri de 2025
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/nissan/qashqai/6d3f50
The Nissan Qashqai was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in October 2022.
Nissan has since introduced changes to the safety specification of the Qashqai, and this ANCAP safety rating applies to all Nissan Qashqai vehicles built from November 2025 and on sale from March 2026 (VIN SJNJ12***A2261759 onwards). A separate rating applies to Nissan Qashqai vehicles built prior to November 2025.
This ANCAP safety rating for the Nissan Qashqai is based on testing of the Nissan Qashqai conducted in 2021 and 2025.
Jacc Hunter
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.ancap....9b01a09c4275bfa9d982f/original.pdf?1775622997
This ANCAP safety rating for the JAC Hunter is based on testing of the closely related JAC T9, conducted in 2024. Additional frontal offset (MPDB) and oblique pole tests were performed on the JAC Hunter in order to confirm integrity of the battery and safety of high voltage electrical systems in PHEV variants.
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/nissan/qashqai/6d3f50
The Nissan Qashqai was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in October 2022.
Nissan has since introduced changes to the safety specification of the Qashqai, and this ANCAP safety rating applies to all Nissan Qashqai vehicles built from November 2025 and on sale from March 2026 (VIN SJNJ12***A2261759 onwards). A separate rating applies to Nissan Qashqai vehicles built prior to November 2025.
This ANCAP safety rating for the Nissan Qashqai is based on testing of the Nissan Qashqai conducted in 2021 and 2025.
Jacc Hunter
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.ancap....9b01a09c4275bfa9d982f/original.pdf?1775622997
This ANCAP safety rating for the JAC Hunter is based on testing of the closely related JAC T9, conducted in 2024. Additional frontal offset (MPDB) and oblique pole tests were performed on the JAC Hunter in order to confirm integrity of the battery and safety of high voltage electrical systems in PHEV variants.
Attachments
2026 Kia Sportage NHTSA Crash test
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2026/KIA/SPORTAGE/SUV/FWD
5/5 Overall Safety Rating
Side Crash
5/5
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2026/KIA/SPORTAGE/SUV/FWD
5/5 Overall Safety Rating
Side Crash
Opel Corsa A
93 Volvo 850 GLT Into 1986 Volkswagen Golf 5 Dr. Rear Crash Test (Accident Reconstruction)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkbLF0e4NeY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkbLF0e4NeY
Nissan Leaf 2026 IIHS crash test
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicl...back/2026#moderate-overlap-front-updated-test
Small overlap front
The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating. Driver-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf SV+ EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Driver injury measures
Passenger-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf SV+ EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
Passenger injury measures
Driver injury measures
About the small overlap front test Moderate overlap front: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf S+ 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year.
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head came close to contacting the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a moderate risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis. Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Driver injury measures
Rear passenger injury measures
About the moderate overlap front test
February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicl...back/2026#moderate-overlap-front-updated-test
Small overlap front
The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating. Driver-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf SV+ EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 8 |
| Footrest (cm) | 4 |
| Left toepan (cm) | 1 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
| Parking brake (cm) | 0 |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
| Steering column | 0 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 6 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 6 |
| Lower instrument panel (cm) | 5 |
| HIC-15 | 115 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 1.2 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 31 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.32 |
| 25 | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 0.6 |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 1 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.32 |
| Right | 0.33 |
| Left | 1.9 |
| Right | 1.8 |
| Left | 55 |
| Right | 53 |
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf SV+ EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 8 |
| Footrest (cm) | 5 |
| Right toepan (cm) | 3 |
| Center toepan (cm) | 2 |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
| Center dash (cm) | 4 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 11 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 5 |
| Right lower dash (cm) | 4 |
| HIC-15 | 113 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 1.1 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 21 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.28 |
| 23 | |
| Left | 0.6 |
| Right | 0.2 |
| Left | 2 |
| Right | 1 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.35 |
| Right | 0.35 |
| Left | 1.9 |
| Right | 1.5 |
| Left | 73 |
| Right | 51 |
| HIC-15 | 66 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 14 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.17 |
| 37 | |
| Left | 0.2 |
| Right | 0.3 |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 1 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.25 |
| Right | 0.20 |
| Left | 0.3 |
| Right | 0.9 |
| Left | 25 |
| Right | 43 |
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf S+ 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year.
| A | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Thigh/hip | G |
| Leg/foot | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | A |
| Chest | A |
| Thigh | G |
| A |
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head came close to contacting the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a moderate risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis. Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Footrest (cm) | 3 |
| Left (cm) | 5 |
| Center (cm) | 7 |
| Right (cm) | 4 |
| 5 | |
| Left (cm) | 0 |
| Right (cm) | 3 |
| Upward (cm) | 3 |
| Rearward (cm) | -5 |
| 0 |
| HIC-15 | 443 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 1.4 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 14 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.26 |
| 32 | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 0.5 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 2 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.46 |
| Right | 0.52 |
| Left | 1.6 |
| Right | 1.8 |
| Left | 85 |
| Right | 41 |
| HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 2.1 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.1 |
| Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Chest index | 40 |
| Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 3.9 |
| Left femur compression | 0.1 |
| Right femur compression | 0.2 |
February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Leaf EV 4-door
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Leaf was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Leaf conducted by Nissan.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Torso | G |
| Pelvis | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Torso | G |
| Pelvis | G |
| G |
Pelas últimas notícias do Ancap o Skoda Octavia sofreu, algum tipo de restyling que levou o Ancap a restestá-lo. Como de costume não consegui saber que tipo de restyling foi, pois o novo site do Euroncap está uma bela porcaria
The Skoda Octavia was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in April 2021. Updates were introduced for vehicles built from July 2025 on sale from March 2026, and this ANCAP safety rating applies to all vehicles built from July 2025 and on sale from March 2026 (sedan VIN TMBBV0NX0TM****** onwards and wagon VIN TMBKV0NX6TY****** onwards).
A foto que coloco é a do teste do Euroncap
Finally, the Skoda Octavia retained its five-star rating following a reassessment of vehicles built from July 2025. It scored 85 per cent for Adult Occupancy Protection, 81 per cent for Child Occupancy Protection and Vulnerable Road User Protection and 82 per cent for Safety Assist.
Penso que seja por causa disto
"The Skoda Octavia (Nov 2024–onwards) holds a 5-star ANCAP safety rating, re-confirmed for models built from July 2025. It achieved 85% for adult occupant protection and 81% for child occupant protection, based on Euro NCAP testing. The rating applies to hatchback and wagon variants, featuring standard autonomous emergency braking (AEB), lane support, and a center airbag. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]"
The Skoda Octavia was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in April 2021. Updates were introduced for vehicles built from July 2025 on sale from March 2026, and this ANCAP safety rating applies to all vehicles built from July 2025 and on sale from March 2026 (sedan VIN TMBBV0NX0TM****** onwards and wagon VIN TMBKV0NX6TY****** onwards).
A foto que coloco é a do teste do Euroncap
Finally, the Skoda Octavia retained its five-star rating following a reassessment of vehicles built from July 2025. It scored 85 per cent for Adult Occupancy Protection, 81 per cent for Child Occupancy Protection and Vulnerable Road User Protection and 82 per cent for Safety Assist.
Penso que seja por causa disto
"The Skoda Octavia (Nov 2024–onwards) holds a 5-star ANCAP safety rating, re-confirmed for models built from July 2025. It achieved 85% for adult occupant protection and 81% for child occupant protection, based on Euro NCAP testing. The rating applies to hatchback and wagon variants, featuring standard autonomous emergency braking (AEB), lane support, and a center airbag. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]"
Last edited:
Ancap tesla Model Y 2026 6 lugares crash test
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/tesla/model-y-l/eaecda
The six-seat, three-row Tesla Model Y L has been awarded five stars, carrying through strong results in Safety Assist and Adult Occupant Protection. The rating is based on testing of the related five-seat Model Y, with additional testing and assessments undertaken to make sure results were applicable to the longer-wheelbase variant. Difficulties were identified with child restraint installation in second row seating positions, where many restraints could not be correctly installed due to limitations with top tether routing. In the third row, rearward-facing and forward-facing convertible child restraints could not be easily installed using the ISOFix anchorages. As a result, care should be taken when selecting and installing child restraints in these positions.
The Tesla Model Y L was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in March 2026.
A) This ANCAP safety rating for the six seat, three row Tesla Model Y L is based on testing of the closely-related five seat, two row Tesla Model Y. ANCAP was provided with technical information to show that the test results of the Tesla Model Y are also applicable to the Tesla Model Y L.
Separate safety ratings are available for five seat, two row Tesla Model Y variants.
B) Difficulties were identified with child restraint installation in second row seating positions, where many restraints could not be correctly installed due to limitations with top tether routing.
C) In the third row, rearward-facing and forward-facing convertible child restraints could not be easily installed using the ISOFix anchorages.
As a result, care should be taken when selecting and installing child restraints in these positions.
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/tesla/model-y-l/eaecda
The six-seat, three-row Tesla Model Y L has been awarded five stars, carrying through strong results in Safety Assist and Adult Occupant Protection. The rating is based on testing of the related five-seat Model Y, with additional testing and assessments undertaken to make sure results were applicable to the longer-wheelbase variant. Difficulties were identified with child restraint installation in second row seating positions, where many restraints could not be correctly installed due to limitations with top tether routing. In the third row, rearward-facing and forward-facing convertible child restraints could not be easily installed using the ISOFix anchorages. As a result, care should be taken when selecting and installing child restraints in these positions.
The Tesla Model Y L was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in March 2026.
A) This ANCAP safety rating for the six seat, three row Tesla Model Y L is based on testing of the closely-related five seat, two row Tesla Model Y. ANCAP was provided with technical information to show that the test results of the Tesla Model Y are also applicable to the Tesla Model Y L.
Separate safety ratings are available for five seat, two row Tesla Model Y variants.
B) Difficulties were identified with child restraint installation in second row seating positions, where many restraints could not be correctly installed due to limitations with top tether routing.
C) In the third row, rearward-facing and forward-facing convertible child restraints could not be easily installed using the ISOFix anchorages.
As a result, care should be taken when selecting and installing child restraints in these positions.
LinoMarques
Well-known member
IIHS Crash Test-15/5/2026
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/two-additional-models-earn-awards-in-latest-iihs-ratings
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/two-additional-models-earn-awards-in-latest-iihs-ratings
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/hyundai/palisade-4-door-suv/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/prius-4-door-hatchback/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/a3-4-door-sedan/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/bmw/3-series-4-door-sedan/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/bmw/i4-4-door-sedan/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/chevrolet/equinox-4-door-suv/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/ford/maverick-crew-cab-pickup/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/ford/ranger-crew-cab-pickup/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/honda/ridgeline-crew-cab-pickup/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/k4-4-door-hatchback/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/jeep/compass-4-door-suv/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/nissan/frontier-crew-cab-pickup/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/4runner-4-door-suv/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/corolla-4-door-sedan/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/land-cruiser-4-door-suv/2026
- https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/toyota/sequoia-4-door-suv/2026
nto
New member
Dacia Duster conquista as 5 estrelas 
no EuroNCAP Indiano/Bharat Ncap
The new Duster delivered an impressive performance in both adult and child occupant protection categories:
Adult Occupant Protection: 30.49/32
Child Occupant Protection: 45/49
These scores place the Duster among the safer SUVs in its segment.
no EuroNCAP Indiano/Bharat Ncap
The new Duster delivered an impressive performance in both adult and child occupant protection categories:
Adult Occupant Protection: 30.49/32
Child Occupant Protection: 45/49
These scores place the Duster among the safer SUVs in its segment.
Last edited:
PMCF
New member
Eu inquiri o EuroNcap, hoje tive a resposta.
Dizem que tem o eC3 no plano deste ano, os restantes modelos da mesma plataforma, C3 aircross, Frontera, Panda, não tem nada.