Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap -2 Setembro 2026
- Thread starter GTTDI
- Start date
PMCF
New member
Pois também fiquei desiludido. Só saiu estes dois, cheira-me a marosca.
Em Maio, perguntei a eles e disseram o seguinte:
"
Dear ***** **********,
Thank you for your message and for your interest in Euro NCAP’s 2026 programme.
We can confirm that the Citroën ë-C3 is listed on the Euro NCAP operations board as a Safety Campaign item. The Opel Frontera, Fiat Grande Panda and C3 Aircross are not listed on the current Euro NCAP operations board, so we cannot confirm those models from the published programme information.
We understand your concern about high-volume vehicles and the need for transparent safety data. We will continue to publish results once assessments have been completed.
Kind regards, [TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, cellspacing: 0, width: 524"]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD="colspan: 7"]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
"
Em Maio, perguntei a eles e disseram o seguinte:
"
Dear ***** **********,
Thank you for your message and for your interest in Euro NCAP’s 2026 programme.
We can confirm that the Citroën ë-C3 is listed on the Euro NCAP operations board as a Safety Campaign item. The Opel Frontera, Fiat Grande Panda and C3 Aircross are not listed on the current Euro NCAP operations board, so we cannot confirm those models from the published programme information.
We understand your concern about high-volume vehicles and the need for transparent safety data. We will continue to publish results once assessments have been completed.
Kind regards, [TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, cellspacing: 0, width: 524"]
[TR]
[TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD="colspan: 7"]
Ines da Silva Teixeira
Administrative Support
M. +32 478 16 05 86 | E. ines_dasilvateixeira@euroncap.com
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
"
PMCF
New member
Muito sinceramente, começo a desconfiar de má fé desta gente.
Icedevice
Well-known member
Ai só agora? Isto é evidente desde o início. Não me lembro de um conjunto de veículos de grande volume da Citroen/Opel/Fiat que não tenha sido testado antes do lançamento ou nos primeiros meses de mercado.
É mais que óbvio que a estrutura levanta muitas preocupações e que a Stelantis não quer o teste. Passados mais de 2 anos de mercado o Euroncap ainda não encontrou um tempinho para testar uma gama com centenas de milhares de carros vendidos na Europa de marcas de enorme implantação mas tiveram tempo para testar carros chineses absolutamente residuais como o Donfeng Box ou modelos de marcas das quais nem conhecemos o nome tipo Hongqi.
Mesmo quando fizerem o teste acho que vou desconfiar da isenção dos resultados.
É mais que óbvio que a estrutura levanta muitas preocupações e que a Stelantis não quer o teste. Passados mais de 2 anos de mercado o Euroncap ainda não encontrou um tempinho para testar uma gama com centenas de milhares de carros vendidos na Europa de marcas de enorme implantação mas tiveram tempo para testar carros chineses absolutamente residuais como o Donfeng Box ou modelos de marcas das quais nem conhecemos o nome tipo Hongqi.
Mesmo quando fizerem o teste acho que vou desconfiar da isenção dos resultados.
PMCF
New member
Recomendo que façam como eu, chateiem, e devíamos se calhar partilhar este assunto om os meios de comunicação social. Água mole em pedra dura.....
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Já me lembrei de contactar o ADAC, que faz parte do consórcio Euro NCAP.
PMCF
New member
Não é má ideia, e porventura associações de direitos dos consumidores europeus.
Icedevice
Well-known member
Eu mandei e-mail há uns meses a perguntar e eles mandaram-me uma resposta pre-feita a dizer que se preocupam muito bla bla bla e que tem limitações orçamentais, bla bla e quando eu lhe respondi a perguntar porque é que testaram o Donfeng e o Elbro, e o Hongqi, já não responderam de volta [
]. E os jornalistas/youtubers têm sido cumplices, claramente.
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Documentação muito interessante sobre o uso dos airbags na década de 1970:
E aqui alguns exemplos do longo histórico da Volvo no aspecto da segurança passiva:
Mais documentação à venda aqui:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=crash
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=airbag
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=car%20safety
E aqui alguns exemplos do longo histórico da Volvo no aspecto da segurança passiva:
Mais documentação à venda aqui:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=crash
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=airbag
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filt ering&_ssn=gallimoresgoods&store_name=gallimoresgo ods&_oac=1&_nkw=car%20safety
Last edited:
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Tenho, mas esse foi numa Auto Hoje, penso que de 1994.
Penso que seja o único crash test que me falta , publicado pelo autohoje. Se quiseres troco por um autohoje que tem um comparativo, do teu amado 406 Coupé vs o Lancia Kappa Coupé
Audi A6 2026 IIHS crash test
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/a6-4-door-sedan/2026
Small overlap front
The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating. Driver-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Driver-side small overlap front ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Driver injury measures
Passenger-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Passenger-side small overlap front ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
Passenger injury measures
Driver injury measures
About the small overlap front test Moderate overlap front: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year.
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head came close to contacting the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the chest and a moderate risk of injury to the head or neck. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis. Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Driver injury measures
Rear passenger injury measures
About the moderate overlap front test
February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
[TD="colspan: 2"]Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.[/TD]
Driver injury measures
Passenger injury measures
About the side crash test Headlights
Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
(1) Trim level(s): Premium trim
0 ft100 ft200 ft300 ft400 ft500 ft600 ftLow beamsOptimal low-beamilluminationHigh beamsOptimal high-beamilluminationSome glare
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves. Technical measurements for this test
About the headlight evaluation
(2) Trim level(s): Premium Plus trim, Prestige trim
0 ft100 ft200 ft300 ft400 ft500 ft600 ftLow beamsOptimal low-beamilluminationHigh beamsOptimal high-beamilluminationHigh-beam assist credit
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and gradual right curves and fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves. Technical measurements for this test
About the headlight evaluation Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0
System details
Passenger car target
Motorcycle target
Semitrailer
Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.
About the front crash prevention test Front crash prevention: pedestrian
System details
[TD="colspan: 2"]Includes high-beam assist credit[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"] Rating applies to all 2026 models [/TD]
Crossing child — day
Rating applies to 2026 models
Technical measurements for this test
About the seat belt reminder evaluation Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2026 models
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware. It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
123
Details by seating position
titute, 501(c)(3) organizations | Copyright information and privacy policy
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/a6-4-door-sedan/2026
Small overlap front
The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating. Driver-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Driver-side small overlap front ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G |
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 |
| Footrest (cm) | 10 |
| Left toepan (cm) | 3 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
| Parking brake (cm) | |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
| Steering column | 0 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 3 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 4 |
| Lower instrument panel (cm) | 3 |
| HIC-15 | 272 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 12 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.19 |
| 26 | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 0.5 |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 1 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.57 |
| Right | 0.47 |
| Left | 2.4 |
| Right | 3.8 |
| Left | 99 |
| Right | 91 |
Passenger-side
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Passenger-side small overlap front ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Hip/thigh | G |
| Lower leg/foot | G |
| G |
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 9 |
| Footrest (cm) | 15 |
| Right toepan (cm) | 5 |
| Center toepan (cm) | 2 |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
| Center dash (cm) | 2 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 1 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 3 |
| Right lower dash (cm) | 3 |
| HIC-15 | 319 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 6 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.29 |
| 22 | |
| Left | 0.6 |
| Right | 1.0 |
| Left | 2 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.44 |
| Right | 0.64 |
| Left | 3.1 |
| Right | 3.1 |
| Left | 75 |
| Right | 105 |
| HIC-15 | 111 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 0.4 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 10 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.21 |
| 30 | |
| Left | 0.2 |
| Right | 0.3 |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 1 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.24 |
| Right | 0.19 |
| Left | 0.2 |
| Right | 0.2 |
| Left | 53 |
| Right | 46 |
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Chest | G |
| Thigh/hip | G |
| Leg/foot | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | A |
| Chest | G |
| Thigh | G |
| A |
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head came close to contacting the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the chest and a moderate risk of injury to the head or neck. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis. Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Footrest (cm) | 2 |
| Left (cm) | 2 |
| Center (cm) | 3 |
| Right (cm) | 3 |
| 5 | |
| Left (cm) | 1 |
| Right (cm) | 1 |
| Upward (cm) | -2 |
| Rearward (cm) | -7 |
| 0 |
Driver injury measures
| HIC-15 | 214 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 1.1 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 10 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.25 |
| 33 | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 0.6 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Left | 0.21 |
| Right | 0.49 |
| Left | 1.9 |
| Right | 1.9 |
| Left | 51 |
| Right | 57 |
Rear passenger injury measures
| HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 2.1 |
| Compression (kN) | 1.0 |
| Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Chest index | 34 |
| Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 4.2 |
| Left femur compression | 0.1 |
| Right femur compression | 0.1 |
February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Audi A6 3.0T Premium quattro 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Audi A6 was redesigned for the 2026 model year. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 A6 conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
| G | |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Torso | A |
| Pelvis | G |
| G | |
| Head/neck | G |
| Torso | G |
| Pelvis | G |
| G |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| -23.5 |
[TD="colspan: 2"]Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.[/TD]
Driver injury measures
| HIC-15 | 233 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 1.5 |
| Compression (kN) | -0.6 |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 33 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.7 |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 35 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 34 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.44 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.98 |
| Combined force (kN) | 3.7 |
| HIC-15 | 183 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Tension (kN) | 0.4 |
| Compression (kN) | -0.1 |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 13 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 0.7 |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 22 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 21 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.67 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.28 |
| Combined force (kN) | 2.6 |
Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
(1) Trim level(s): Premium trim
| LED projector |
| LED projector |
| No |
| Yes |
| G |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves. Technical measurements for this test
|
| LED projector |
| LED projector |
| No |
| Yes |
| G |
| Straightaway right edge | 124.7 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 62.9 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 75.5 m | 5.0% |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 72.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 63.7 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 59.0 m | None |
| Straightaway right edge | 134.5 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 161.7 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 75.1 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 74.7 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 63.7 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 57.7 m |
(2) Trim level(s): Premium Plus trim, Prestige trim
| LED projector |
| LED projector |
| No |
| Yes |
| A |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and gradual right curves and fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves. Technical measurements for this test
|
| LED projector |
| LED projector |
| No |
| Yes |
| A |
| Straightaway right edge | 79.5 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 54.9 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 78.4 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, right edge | 48.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 66.0 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 51.6 m | None |
| Straightaway right edge | 126.0 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 133.4 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 78.9 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 83.1 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 64.7 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 64.6 m |
System details
- standard Active Front Assist
| Overall evaluation | G |
| Rating applies to all 2026 models |
| 31 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 31 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided | |
| 37 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 37 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided | |
| 43 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 43 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided |
| 31 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 31 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided | |
| 37 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 37 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided | |
| 43 mph/target centered | Collision avoided | |
| 43 mph/target off-center | Collision avoided |
Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.
| 31 mph/target centered | |
| 37 mph/target centered | |
| 43 mph/target centered |
System details
- standard Active Front Assist
| Overall evaluation | G |
[TD="colspan: 2"]Includes high-beam assist credit[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"] Rating applies to all 2026 models [/TD]
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 22 mph.
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 2.2 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision and a warning was issued 1.7 seconds before impact.
Rating applies to 2026 models
| G | |
| Initiation time | |
| Duration | Long enough (90+ seconds) |
| Volume | |
| Audio frequency | |
| Initiation time | |
| Duration at least 60 seconds | |
| Initiation time | |
| Duration at least 30 seconds | |
| Volume | |
| Audio frequency |
Rating applies to 2026 models
| Overall evaluation | G |
| Seat type | leatherette |
123
| G | Good |
| A | Acceptable |
| M | Marginal |
| P | Poor |
| Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
| thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
| lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
| shared lower achors symbol | Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) |
| No hardware available |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| not too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| easy to maneuver around anchors | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| none available | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| not too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| easy to maneuver around anchors |
Last edited:
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Não troco crash tests por nada! []
Além de que tenho essa teste original da ams.
Nem por estes todos...
LinoMarques
Well-known member
CTs têm prioridade. []
Em relação a esse A6, cada vez mais me convenço de que os bancos dianteiros deviam ter airbags nas costas para protegerem os passageiros de trás. O movimento que fazem para a frente com a cabeça/pescoço é muito violento!
]Em relação a esse A6, cada vez mais me convenço de que os bancos dianteiros deviam ter airbags nas costas para protegerem os passageiros de trás. O movimento que fazem para a frente com a cabeça/pescoço é muito violento!
Xiaomi SU7 crash test
https://www.bitauto.com/global/news/100195745608.html
Recently, the Beijing Quality Inspection Institute conducted a crash test on 30 popular vehicle models on the market. This test was very rigorous, with all test vehicles purchased at their own expense from various 4S stores across China to ensure they were the same production vehicles as those bought by consumers. Additionally, all these crash test vehicles had purchase invoice records and car pickup videos. To ensure professionalism and authority, all testing procedures were completed by professional personnel from the Beijing Quality Inspection Institute. Among these, the crash test results of the Xiaomi SU7 are of great concern to many users, as this is Xiaomi Car's first attempt at car manufacturing. Today, we will focus on the crash test results of the Xiaomi SU7.
zz0.71i74xa1458zz
https://www.bitauto.com/global/news/100195745608.html
Recently, the Beijing Quality Inspection Institute conducted a crash test on 30 popular vehicle models on the market. This test was very rigorous, with all test vehicles purchased at their own expense from various 4S stores across China to ensure they were the same production vehicles as those bought by consumers. Additionally, all these crash test vehicles had purchase invoice records and car pickup videos. To ensure professionalism and authority, all testing procedures were completed by professional personnel from the Beijing Quality Inspection Institute. Among these, the crash test results of the Xiaomi SU7 are of great concern to many users, as this is Xiaomi Car's first attempt at car manufacturing. Today, we will focus on the crash test results of the Xiaomi SU7.
zz0.71i74xa1458zz
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Até se safou +/-, o telemóvel. []
]
PMCF
New member
Resposta do Euro Ncap, em relação ao teste do e-C3:
"Thank you for your email.
We understand that you were hoping to see the results for the Citroën ë-C3 in our latest publication.
Please note that Euro NCAP cannot assess every new vehicle as soon as it is launched. As an independent, non-profit organisation, we are subject to budgetary, resource and testing capacity constraints. Each year, we therefore prioritise a selection of vehicles for assessment, and the timing of publication depends on the completion of the full assessment process.
As mentioned previously, the Citroën ë-C3 is part of the Euro NCAP testing programme. However, we are unfortunately unable to provide a publication date at this stage, as assessment schedules may change.
We recommend keeping an eye on our website, where all new assessment results are published as soon as they become available."
"Thank you for your email.
We understand that you were hoping to see the results for the Citroën ë-C3 in our latest publication.
Please note that Euro NCAP cannot assess every new vehicle as soon as it is launched. As an independent, non-profit organisation, we are subject to budgetary, resource and testing capacity constraints. Each year, we therefore prioritise a selection of vehicles for assessment, and the timing of publication depends on the completion of the full assessment process.
As mentioned previously, the Citroën ë-C3 is part of the Euro NCAP testing programme. However, we are unfortunately unable to provide a publication date at this stage, as assessment schedules may change.
We recommend keeping an eye on our website, where all new assessment results are published as soon as they become available."