Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap- 10/10/2026

Última edição:
GTTDI disse:
Ora o Pascal Dragotto não devia ter mais nada para fazer e decidiu pegar numa Peugeot 306 carrinha fase 2 e bater contra a lateral de um Peugeot 306 fase 1. Intressante ver que, o 306 fase 1 apresenta deformações extremamente grandes na lateral, tendo a carroçaria colapsado . Pena não terem feito um crash test lateral com a 306 geração 2

Neste crash test entre uma Nissan Serena que embate, lateralmente num 306 restyling e apesar do peso do veiculo que embate na sua lateral apresenta, deformações menores do que no caso do 306 pré restyling

E ainda temos este teste, em que um Citroen Xantia Mk2 embate na lateral direita de um Peugeot 306 restyling (talvez 97?ou 99)
Clique para expandir...

Efectivamente, aquando do restyling do 306 (que coincidiu com o lançamento da carrinha), este viu a sua estrutura reforçada, especialmente a nível lateral. Nestes testes percebe-se que, felizmente, com efeitos práticos visíveis. :)
 
Legendary 80s & 90s Cars Crash Tests. How Safe Were Classic Cars?

​


Legendary SUVs Crash Test: The Truth About 80s and 90s Safety

 
Última edição:
Hyundai i10 Latin Ncap - zero estrelas
https://www.globalncap.org/news/hyundai-falls-short-with-zero-star-result-in-africa


image.png​
The crash test report noted:
  • Concerning weak protection for the driver’s chest in frontal impact test.
  • High risk of non-recoverable chest injuries, leading to strong probability of life-threatening injuries for the adult in the side impact test. Maximum allowed injury levels in a critical body region such as the chest were exceeded, resulting in zero points for adult occupant protection.
  • In the frontal impact test, the bodyshell and footwell were rated as unstable and could not withstand further loading.
  • No standard side body or head protection and Seat Belt Reminder (SBR) only for the driver.
  • No standard ESC.
​
image.png​
 
Five-star ANCAP ratings for MG 7, updated MG ZS, and GWM Haval H7​

Denza B5
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/denza/b5/d50378

image.png

​MG ZS
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/mg/zs/2acd6f

image.png

​MG 7
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.ancap....983bc9f1311d0bfb4c094/original.pdf?1766054608

image.png​

GWM Haval H7
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/great-wall-motors/haval-h7/93729c

During the full-width frontal test, the head restraint dislodged from the driver’s seat back. While this does not affect scoring under 2023-2025 rating criteria, it may increase the risk of injury to the driver.

Following ANCAP’s identification of the issue, GWM have initiated a voluntary safety recall (REC-006513).

The ANCAP safety rating for the Haval H7 applies only to vehicles built from 15 October 2025. For vehicles built prior to this date (VINs LGWEFUA60RF800006 to LGWEFUA6XSF802190), the rating will only apply where the recall action has been completed.
​

image.png​
 
Suzuki Fronx Ancap Crqash test
https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.ancap....6c9651d680aeae96b4426/original.pdf?1766367561

image.png​
image.png​


n addition to its poor overall crash performance, ANCAP testing identified a serious and separate safety concern, with a rear seatbelt failure occurring during the full width frontal crash test. This component failure has been reported to Australian and New Zealand vehicle safety regulators.

Crash testing showed the Suzuki Fronx delivered poor levels of occupant protection for both adults and children. In the full width frontal test, excessive chest loads were recorded for the rear passenger, exceeding ANCAP performance thresholds and resulting in the score being capped under ANCAP assessment protocols.

Key body regions of both the 10-year-old and 6-year-old child occupants were also capped at zero points, due to high head acceleration and excessive neck tension.

During the full width frontal test, the rear passenger seatbelt retractor of the Suzuki Fronx failed, resulting in an uncontrolled seatbelt release where the rear dummy became unrestrained, allowing it to strike the rear of the front seat.

While the component failure is serious, the vehicle had already received zero points in the full width frontal test before the failure occurred, due to the high chest load recorded.

Importantly, the one star rating reflects the Fronx’s overall crash performance - particularly the performance of its structure and restraint systems - and is not a consequence of the separate seatbelt component failure. zz0.ewvyh8x9ls6zz
 

Anexos

  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    360,8KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    371,5KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    359,9KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    374,5KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    383,3KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    335,1KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    342,5KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    372,9KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    346,9KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    383,4KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    334,8KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    371,5KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    364,2KB · Visualizações: 0
  • imagem.png
    imagem.png
    372KB · Visualizações: 0
Última edição:
1980s vs 2026 European Car Safety Evolution | Shocking Crash Tests

​


1980s vs 2026 Japanese Car Safety Evolution | Shocking Crash Tests

​


Old vs New BMW 3 Series Crash Test – 50 Years of Crash Test Evolution

​
 
  • Gosto
Reações: nto
Ancap 2025 Suzuki Fronx crash test
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/suzuki/fronx/cb710f


The Suzuki Fronx city SUV has been slammed with a one-star ANCAP safety rating after recording "low levels" of occupant protection – and a "rare and serious" rear seatbelt failure that has been referred to government regulators.

The Fronx's crash performance was so poor that the seatbelt failure – which allowed the rear dummy to headbutt the front passenger seat – did not impact the safety rating as it "already received zero points" in that test.

It narrowly avoided a zero-star rating, earning just 40 per cent for Child Occupant Protection – the bare minimum needed for a one-star overall score, and the lowest in that 'pillar' of assessment since 2017.
Suzuki has pulled the vehicle from sale while it investigates the safety results, and said in a media statement today it has "elevated the review of this assessment to a matter of immediate focus".

MORE: 2025 Suzuki Swift hit with one-star safety rating in Australia, down from three stars in Europe
​




image.png - Click image for larger version Name: image.png Size: 1.21 MB ID: 14668426

image.png - Click image for larger version Name: image.png Size: 78.8 KB ID: 14668427

image.png - Click image for larger version Name: image.png Size: 97.4 KB ID: 14668428image.png - Click image for larger version Name: image.png Size: 673.3 KB ID: 14668429​​​​
 
Última edição:
Deve fazer início de sessão ou registar-se para responder aqui.
Voltar
Superior