Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap- 10/10/2026
- Iniciador de tópicos GTTDI
- Data de início
LinoMarques
Well-known member
No caso do Civic, mau seria se após 12 anos e várias gerações depois, o carro não fosse mais seguro. Isso só pode ter sido escrito por um daqueles fanboys que gosta de atirar areia para os olhos... dos outros fanboys!
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Simca/Chrysler 1307 a 65 km/h vs. Camião Ford para testar protecção especial que evite que o ligeiro fique debaixo do camião num embate frontal:
À venda no eBay: https://www.ebay.de/itm/146873135770
À venda no eBay: https://www.ebay.de/itm/146873135770
Última edição:
este teste é aquele em que comparam o crash test realizado pela AMS em 93, com os resultados obtidos pelos mesmos modelos usados, apos/com 12 anos
Resultados IIHS 28 Outubro
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/nine-additional-models-qualify-for-iihs-awards
Audi A5
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/all-new-a5-4-door-sedan/2025
The Audi All-new A5 was introduced for the 2025 model year. For the 2025 model year only, the A5 was renamed the Audi All-new A5 because both models were built concurrently. Two driver-side small overlap front tests of the All-new A5 were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Volkswagen/Audi. Ratings are based on both tests.
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/nine-additional-models-qualify-for-iihs-awards
Audi A5
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/all-new-a5-4-door-sedan/2025
The Audi All-new A5 was introduced for the 2025 model year. For the 2025 model year only, the A5 was renamed the Audi All-new A5 because both models were built concurrently. Two driver-side small overlap front tests of the All-new A5 were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Volkswagen/Audi. Ratings are based on both tests.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/audi/q6-sportback-e-tron-4-door-suv/2025
2025 Audi Q6 e-tron quattro
Rating applies to 2025 models
The Audi Q6 e-tron and Q6 Sportback e-tron were introduced for the 2025 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Q6 e-tron conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
2025 Audi Q6 e-tron quattro
Rating applies to 2025 models
The Audi Q6 e-tron and Q6 Sportback e-tron were introduced for the 2025 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Q6 e-tron conducted by Volkswagen/Audi.
2026 Ford Explorer
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Ford/explorer-4-door-suv/2026
Two tests of a 2020 Explorer were conducted. In the first test, forces recorded on the dummy's left lower leg were high, leading to a poor lower leg/foot injury rating and an overall acceptable rating. In response, Ford modified the left and right front subframe structure to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes beginning with cars manufactured after May 2020 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).
In the second test of an Explorer built after the structural modifications were in place, the lower leg/foot rating improved to acceptable and the overall rating improved to good.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Ford/explorer-4-door-suv/2026
Two tests of a 2020 Explorer were conducted. In the first test, forces recorded on the dummy's left lower leg were high, leading to a poor lower leg/foot injury rating and an overall acceptable rating. In response, Ford modified the left and right front subframe structure to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes beginning with cars manufactured after May 2020 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).
In the second test of an Explorer built after the structural modifications were in place, the lower leg/foot rating improved to acceptable and the overall rating improved to good.
2026 Kia Sportage
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/sportage-4-door-suv/2026
The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2022 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2023 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Hyundai Tucson conducted by Hyundai/Kia
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/sportage-4-door-suv/2026
The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2022 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2023 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Hyundai Tucson conducted by Hyundai/Kia
2026 Hyundai Santa Cruz
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/hyundai/santa-cruz-crew-cab-pickup/2026
The Hyundai Santa Cruz, the first pickup in Hyundai's lineup, was introduced for the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2026 models, changes were made to the rear seat design to improve rear occupant safety in moderate overlap front crashes. Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2024 Hyundai Santa Cruz SEL crew cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2024-26 models
The Hyundai Santa Cruz, the first pickup in Hyundai's lineup, was introduced for the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2024 models, improvements were made to the B-pillar and door reinforcements were applied to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2024 Santa Cruz conducted by Hyundai/Kia.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/hyundai/santa-cruz-crew-cab-pickup/2026
The Hyundai Santa Cruz, the first pickup in Hyundai's lineup, was introduced for the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2026 models, changes were made to the rear seat design to improve rear occupant safety in moderate overlap front crashes. Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2024 Hyundai Santa Cruz SEL crew cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2024-26 models
The Hyundai Santa Cruz, the first pickup in Hyundai's lineup, was introduced for the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2024 models, improvements were made to the B-pillar and door reinforcements were applied to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2024 Santa Cruz conducted by Hyundai/Kia.
2026 Nissan Rogue
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/nissan/rogue-4-door-suv/2026
Passenger-side
Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Rogue S 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models built after April 2022
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2021 model year for vehicles built in the US. Beginning with 2021 Rogue models built in Japan after February 2021, changes to the passenger-side frontal airbag and front passenger safety belt were implemented to match US built vehicles, and to improve occupant protection in passenger-side small overlap crashes. Further changes to the passenger-side frontal airbag were made beginning with 2022 models built after April 2022. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar. Information about what country a vehicle was built in is available by decoding the VIN number, present at the base of the windshield on the driver side).
Three passenger-side small overlap tests were conducted by Nissan. Because there were no structural changes, the structure rating is based on this test and two other tests of Rogue models conducted by Nissan. Because there were no changes to the driver restraints, driver data is based on all three tests.
Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Rogue SL 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2021 model year. Beginning with 2026 models, Nissan made changes to the side curtain airbags to improve occupant safety in side impact crashes. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Nissan Rogue conducted by Nissan. Because the structure was not changed, the structure rating is based on this test and an earlier test of a 2025 Rogue conducted by the Institute.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/nissan/rogue-4-door-suv/2026
Passenger-side
Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Rogue S 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models built after April 2022
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2021 model year for vehicles built in the US. Beginning with 2021 Rogue models built in Japan after February 2021, changes to the passenger-side frontal airbag and front passenger safety belt were implemented to match US built vehicles, and to improve occupant protection in passenger-side small overlap crashes. Further changes to the passenger-side frontal airbag were made beginning with 2022 models built after April 2022. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar. Information about what country a vehicle was built in is available by decoding the VIN number, present at the base of the windshield on the driver side).
Three passenger-side small overlap tests were conducted by Nissan. Because there were no structural changes, the structure rating is based on this test and two other tests of Rogue models conducted by Nissan. Because there were no changes to the driver restraints, driver data is based on all three tests.
Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Rogue SL 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2026 models
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2021 model year. Beginning with 2026 models, Nissan made changes to the side curtain airbags to improve occupant safety in side impact crashes. Side impact ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2026 Nissan Rogue conducted by Nissan. Because the structure was not changed, the structure rating is based on this test and an earlier test of a 2025 Rogue conducted by the Institute.
2026 Toyota Corolla Cross
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Toyota/corolla-cross-4-door-suv/2026
Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross LE 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models
The Toyota Corolla Cross was introduced in the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2025 models, changes were made to the front side curtain airbag and front door trim to improve driver safety in side impact crashes. Two side impact tests of the Corolla Cross were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Toyota. Ratings are based on both tests.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Toyota/corolla-cross-4-door-suv/2026
Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross LE 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models
The Toyota Corolla Cross was introduced in the 2022 model year. Beginning with 2025 models, changes were made to the front side curtain airbag and front door trim to improve driver safety in side impact crashes. Two side impact tests of the Corolla Cross were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Toyota. Ratings are based on both tests.
2026 Kia EV6
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/ev6-4-door-suv/2026
Tested vehicle: 2025 Kia EV6 Light LR 4-door4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models
The Kia EV6 was introduced in the 2022 model year. These ratings do not apply to the Hyundai Ioniq 5.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/ev6-4-door-suv/2026
Tested vehicle: 2025 Kia EV6 Light LR 4-door4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models
The Kia EV6 was introduced in the 2022 model year. These ratings do not apply to the Hyundai Ioniq 5.
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/mitsubishi/outlander-4-door-suv/2025
The Mitsubishi Outlander was redesigned for the 2022 model year after a one-year absence from the market. Beginning with 2025 models, changes to the driver-side airbags and seatbelt were implemented to improve occupant safety in driver-side small overlap crashes. Two driver-side small overlap front tests of the Outlander were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Mitsubishi. Ratings are based on both tests.
The Mitsubishi Outlander was redesigned for the 2022 model year after a one-year absence from the market. Beginning with 2025 models, changes to the passenger-side airbags and seatbelt were implemented to improve occupant safety in passenger-side small overlap crashes. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Outlander conducted by Mitsubishi.
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/mitsubishi/outlander-4-door-suv/2025
The Mitsubishi Outlander was redesigned for the 2022 model year after a one-year absence from the market. Beginning with 2025 models, changes to the driver-side airbags and seatbelt were implemented to improve occupant safety in driver-side small overlap crashes. Two driver-side small overlap front tests of the Outlander were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Mitsubishi. Ratings are based on both tests.
The Mitsubishi Outlander was redesigned for the 2022 model year after a one-year absence from the market. Beginning with 2025 models, changes to the passenger-side airbags and seatbelt were implemented to improve occupant safety in passenger-side small overlap crashes. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Outlander conducted by Mitsubishi.
Comparativo
Crash test Ford Mondo MK1 vs Ford Sierra
ADAC
As modern as the Ford Sierra appeared when it appeared in 1982, it suddenly became so outdated next to its successor, the Ford Mondeo. This became even more apparent when the two were subjected to a crash test together.
Switching to the next generation of a model is often done because of the flashier appearance, new gadgets or better powertrains. Fewer people will have the improved safety at the forefront as the reason. Although sometimes that can make a significant difference. Certainly in the past, the step in that area was sometimes big with a generation change. Especially from the 1980s to the 1990s, car safety progressed rapidly. This was also proven by a crash test of the Ford Sierra and its successor, the Ford Mondeo.
Exactly thirty years ago we watched when the Mondeo and the Sierra were successively slammed against the wall in Germany in the same room. At 50 km/h, the two middle class cars hit it with the (seen from the car) left corner of the front. Especially in profile, the difference was immediately visible.
Take a look at the front of both cars above. That of the Sierra is clearly much more dented. 5.2 cm further to be exact. At the A-pillar, the body of the Sierra is kinked much further than that of the Mondeo. Furthermore, the windscreen and the dashboard are clearly more battered inwards. The difference was also clearly visible on the inside. “Dashboard and steering wheel are still roughly in place in the Mondeo, the airbag is slack down. Chaos reigns in the Sierra, on the other hand. The dashboard has attacked the driver, plastic parts at knee height have been shattered. The steering wheel has found its way has been swept towards the roof; it stands 25 cm higher than before. It seems destined to be the landing place for the driver’s head.”
Was it all top in the Mondeo? No, not that. Although safety had clearly improved compared to the Sierra, there were certainly still areas for improvement. For example, the driver’s door of the Mondeo only opened after quite a bit of violence, while according to Ford there was already an improved lock in this copy to facilitate this. Furthermore, the test engineers were certainly not happy about what had happened in the footwell of the Mondeo. “The bulkhead behind the pedals is folded up almost vertically, the clutch and brake pedals are pushed towards the driver and blocked, the underbody is strongly curved. That hurts. Although Ford dismisses the objections, the test panel believes that the legroom should be made safer. “
Test results
Despite that blemish on the Ford Mondeo’s reputation, the test panel felt that safety had improved considerably over the Sierra. The Mondeo scored a higher figure in almost all areas, as you can see below. Remarkably enough, salvaging passengers was a fraction easier in the Sierra than in the Mondeo, although on the other hand, the seatbelts in the back and the back seat of the Sierra could cause injuries much sooner than was the case with the Mondeo. [TABLE="border: 1, width: 100%, height: 240"]
[TR]
[TD]Driver safety[/TD]
[TD]Ford Mondeo[/TD]
[TD]Ford Sierra[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Steering wheel[/TD]
[TD]7.2[/TD]
[TD]4.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dashboard[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Footwell[/TD]
[TD]4.4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Seat and belt[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]6.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Driver’s salvage[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Passenger safety[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Seat and belt[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Passenger salvage[/TD]
[TD]5.8[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
– Thanks for information from Autoweek.nl
Crash test Ford Mondo MK1 vs Ford Sierra
ADAC
As modern as the Ford Sierra appeared when it appeared in 1982, it suddenly became so outdated next to its successor, the Ford Mondeo. This became even more apparent when the two were subjected to a crash test together.
Switching to the next generation of a model is often done because of the flashier appearance, new gadgets or better powertrains. Fewer people will have the improved safety at the forefront as the reason. Although sometimes that can make a significant difference. Certainly in the past, the step in that area was sometimes big with a generation change. Especially from the 1980s to the 1990s, car safety progressed rapidly. This was also proven by a crash test of the Ford Sierra and its successor, the Ford Mondeo.
Exactly thirty years ago we watched when the Mondeo and the Sierra were successively slammed against the wall in Germany in the same room. At 50 km/h, the two middle class cars hit it with the (seen from the car) left corner of the front. Especially in profile, the difference was immediately visible.
Take a look at the front of both cars above. That of the Sierra is clearly much more dented. 5.2 cm further to be exact. At the A-pillar, the body of the Sierra is kinked much further than that of the Mondeo. Furthermore, the windscreen and the dashboard are clearly more battered inwards. The difference was also clearly visible on the inside. “Dashboard and steering wheel are still roughly in place in the Mondeo, the airbag is slack down. Chaos reigns in the Sierra, on the other hand. The dashboard has attacked the driver, plastic parts at knee height have been shattered. The steering wheel has found its way has been swept towards the roof; it stands 25 cm higher than before. It seems destined to be the landing place for the driver’s head.”
Was it all top in the Mondeo? No, not that. Although safety had clearly improved compared to the Sierra, there were certainly still areas for improvement. For example, the driver’s door of the Mondeo only opened after quite a bit of violence, while according to Ford there was already an improved lock in this copy to facilitate this. Furthermore, the test engineers were certainly not happy about what had happened in the footwell of the Mondeo. “The bulkhead behind the pedals is folded up almost vertically, the clutch and brake pedals are pushed towards the driver and blocked, the underbody is strongly curved. That hurts. Although Ford dismisses the objections, the test panel believes that the legroom should be made safer. “
Test results
Despite that blemish on the Ford Mondeo’s reputation, the test panel felt that safety had improved considerably over the Sierra. The Mondeo scored a higher figure in almost all areas, as you can see below. Remarkably enough, salvaging passengers was a fraction easier in the Sierra than in the Mondeo, although on the other hand, the seatbelts in the back and the back seat of the Sierra could cause injuries much sooner than was the case with the Mondeo. [TABLE="border: 1, width: 100%, height: 240"]
[TR]
[TD]Driver safety[/TD]
[TD]Ford Mondeo[/TD]
[TD]Ford Sierra[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Steering wheel[/TD]
[TD]7.2[/TD]
[TD]4.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dashboard[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Footwell[/TD]
[TD]4.4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Seat and belt[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]6.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Driver’s salvage[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Passenger safety[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Seat and belt[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Passenger salvage[/TD]
[TD]5.8[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
– Thanks for information from Autoweek.nl
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Novidades Asean Ncap 11/2025
https://www.aseancap.org/
Zeeker
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12541
MG MGS5
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12559
Suzuki Fronx
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12479
BYD Seal
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12438
https://www.aseancap.org/
Zeeker
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12541
MG MGS5
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12559
Suzuki Fronx
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12479
BYD Seal
https://www.aseancap.org/result/12438