Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap -2 Setembro 2026

2013 NHTSA Buick Regal/Opel Insignia crash test
2013 Buick Regal eAssist 4 DR FWD | Safercar -- NHTSA

v07743P001.jpg


Ford Fusion NHTSA Crash Test
http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Sho...-Newer+Vehicles/Vehicle-Detail?vehicleId=7478

v08078P109.jpg
 
Last edited:
Euro NCAP latest results

While some car manufacturers are presenting new models at the Geneva Motor Show, Euro NCAP is announcing today the results for four new cars. The Renault ZOE, Skoda Octavia , Toyota Auris and Toyota RAV4 underwent Euro NCAP’s crash tests and have all achieved the overall five stars.

As from 2013, Euro NCAP is now providing consumers with information on the most widely available child seats throughout Europe. For each new car tested, details on the installation of a series of child seats will help parents to make the safest choice for their kids.

The organization is also rewarding Skoda for the following active safety systems available on the Skoda Octavia: Front Assistant, Lane Assistant, Multi Collision Brake and Crew Protect Assistant.
 
O Octavia atingiu uns impressionantes 82% na protecção dos peões, graças ao capot activo! apr:) Parte má: só na UE é que é vendido de série com esse sistema! Continuamos a ter seres humanos de 1.ª e de 2.ª categoria... [8b][8b][8b]
 
LinoMarques said:
O Octavia atingiu uns impressionantes 82% na protecção dos peões, graças ao capot activo! apr:) Parte má: só na UE é que é vendido de série com esse sistema! Continuamos a ter seres humanos de 1.ª e de 2.ª categoria... [8b][8b][8b]
Click to expand...


Renault Zoe
http://euroncap.com/results/renault/zoe/511.aspx

renault-zoe-test-frontale.png


+ Protecçao dos ocupantes no embate frontal e lateral
-Protecçao no embate contra o poste e no embate traseiro.

No embate lateral contra o poste o Fiesta e o Aveo conseguem muito melhor. O Fiesta é muito mais velho do que o Zoe e conseguiu um resultado muito superior.
No embate traseiro o foi referido em relação ao embate lateral, também pode ser aplicado neste caso
 
Last edited:
Toyota Auris MK2 Euroncap crash test
Toyota Auris | Euro NCAP - For safer cars crash test safety rating

toyota-auris-dopo-test-frontale.png



+Excelente protecção em todos os testes. O Auris entra no clube restrito dos carros, que oferecem o mesmo nivel de proteccao nos dois testes de embate lateral
-Protecção do peito do condutor. O Chevrolet Cruze é mais antigo e oferece uma melhor portecção neste aspecto.
-Abertura durante o embate lateral da porta traseira do lado do condutor!

However, the rear driver's side door opened during the impact. Such door opening could be hazardous for rear seat occupants and the car was penalised

A porta abre durante o embate podendo fazer com que, um ocupante sem cinto possa ser projectado do carro, mas atribuem-lhe 5 estrelas à mesma!...Boa Euroncap apr:)apr:):sh)


toyota-auris-test-laterale.png
 
Toyota Rav 4 MK4 Euroncap Crash test

toyota-rav4-dopo-il-test-frontale.png


+Excelente protecção oferecia aos ocupantes, em todos os testes
-O airbag do condutor não encheu convenientemente, e a cabeça do condutor embateu no volante ( emesmo assim atribuem-lhe 5 estrelas...enfim....

However, the driver's airbag was not sufficiently well inflated to prevent the dummy's head from flattening the airbag and making contact, through the airbag material, with the steering wheel. In this test, dummy readings showed that the resulting contact was not hazardous. However, the car was penliased and protection of the head area was rated as adequate.
 
Subaru Forester 2014-Top Safety Pick-IIHS

2013-subaru-forester-2.jpg


IIHS-HLDI: Subaru Forester

Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. Both driver and passenger side curtains and side torso airbags deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

IIHS-HLDI: Subaru Forester


The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2014 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of side crash test verification.
[h=3]Injury measures:[/h] Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
[h=3]Head protection:[/h] Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.
Rear passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.
 
2013 Honda Civic 2-door-IIHS crash test
MODERATE OVERLAP FRONT TEST

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1730&seriesid=666

Test details:
The Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda as part of frontal crash test verification.

Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the right tibia indicate that injuries to the lower leg would be possible.



Small overlap front test results
IIHS-HLDI: Honda Civic 2-door

The Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year.
Structure — The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 9 cm, and the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel intruded 4 cm.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.
Injury measures — Measures from the dummy indicate that injuries to both the left and right lower legs and the right foot would be possible in a crash of this severity. (Note: during the test, injury data from the neck were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable test
data from Honda, the head/neck injury risk was rated good.)

image.ashx


image.ashx


image.ashx


SIDE IMPACT TEST

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1731&seriesId=666

Test details:

The Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda as part of side crash test verification.
Injury measures:

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Head protection:

Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.
Rear passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Roof strength test results: Good
 
Last edited:
2013 Honda Civic 4-door

[h=2]MODERATE OVERLAP FRONT TEST[/h]http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1728&seriesid=300

[h=2]Test details:[/h] The Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda as part of frontal crash test verification.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.


[h=2]SMALL OVERLAP FRONT TEST[/h]http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1764&seriesid=300

he Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year. Structure — The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 15 cm, and the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel intruded 5-7 cm.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.
Injury measures — Measures from the dummy indicate that injuries to the left lower leg would be possible in a crash of this severity. (Note: during the test, injury data from the neck were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable test data from Honda, the head/neck injury risk was rated good.)

image.ashx


image.ashx



[h=2]SIDE IMPACT TEST[/h]http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1729&seriesId=300


[h=2]Test details:[/h] The Honda Civic was re-engineered for the 2013 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda as part of side crash test verification.
[h=3]Injury measures:[/h] Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures would be possible in a crash of this severity. The risk of significant injuries to other body regions is low.

Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
[h=3]Head protection:[/h] Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.
Rear passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Roof strength test results: Good
 
2013 Volvo XC60
IIHS-HLDI: Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 was introduced in the 2010 model year. Beginning with 2013 models, the side curtain airbags were reprogrammed to deploy in small overlap frontal crashes to improve occupant protection. apr:)

Structure — The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the both the lower and upper interior at 6 cm.

Restraints/dummy kinematics — The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed but does not have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with forward side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deploed.

Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity

image.ashx


image.ashx


image.ashx
 
2013 Ford Fusion built after December 2012
IIHS-HLDI: Lincoln MKZ

The Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ were redesigned for the 2013 model year. Beginning with 2013 Fusion models built after early December 2012, structural changes were made to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). The tested Fusion and all 2013 MKZ models were built after the structural changes were in place. apr:)apr:)apr:)

image.ashx


image.ashx


Penso que este será o novo Mondeo, o que a ser verdade, será dos poucos modelos à venda na Europa, a par do Volvo S60 e do XC 60 que oferecem uma boa protecção nos acidentes do tipo "small overlap".

Roof strength test results: Good
 
2014 Mazda 6 IIHS Crash Test
IIHS-HLDI: Mazda 6

image.ashx


image.ashx


In Mazda's test, after the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury. In the Institute's test, movement was similar except the dummy's head grazed the sunvisor, roof, and grab handle during rebound. Injury measures — Measures from the dummies in the two tests, taken together, indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Head accelerations from the sunvisor, roof, and grab handle hits were low or negligible in the Institute's test.

Small Overlap Front Test
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1768&seriesid=266

Structure — The driver space was maintained reasonably well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 13 cm, and the instrument panel intruded 9-10 cm.


Restraints/dummy kinematics — The dummy’s head remained in contact with the frontal airbag, but its head still moved toward the left side of the steering wheel and A-pillar because the seat belt allowed excessive forward excursion of the head and torso. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.


Injury measures — A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. Measures indicate that injuries to the right lower leg also would be possible. :sh)

Forces on the right lower leg were just high enough to indicate a moderate risk of injury.

image.ashx


image.ashx


[h=2]SIDE IMPACT TEST[/h]http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1766&seriesId=266

The Mazda 6 was redesigned for the 2014 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda as part of side crash test verification.
[h=3]Injury measures:[/h] Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
[h=3]Head protection:[/h] Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.
Rear passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.


Roof strength test results: Good
 
Last edited:
GTTDI said:
2014 Mazda 6 IIHS Crash Test

In Mazda's test, after the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury. In the Institute's test, movement was similar except the dummy's head grazed the sunvisor, roof, and grab handle during rebound. Injury measures — Measures from the dummies in the two tests, taken together, indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Head accelerations from the sunvisor, roof, and grab handle hits were low or negligible in the Institute's test.
Click to expand...
Imperdoável?

Não exageremos...
E a estrutura impressiona pela rigidez tendo em conta que é o mais leve ou dos mais leves do mercado.
 
Refiro-me a esta parte:

A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top