Continuam a cair como patos na estratégia da personagem! [

]
Já percebi que sim, infelizmente o DMA aparenta ter uma grande dificuldade com os factos e infelizmente não é só ele.
Sempre que a realidade não é conforme as teorias malucas entram em negação, começam a defender notícias alternativas e a esbracejar fake news, parecem o trump [

]
"Tax increases continued under FDR, but with greater emphasis on progressive taxes on income and wealth, rather than regressive consumption (sales) taxes [4]. The only major exception was the Social Security tax on wages, starting in 1937.
The Revenue Act of 1934 raised income taxes on the wealthy and reduced them for lower income groups; it also raised estate taxes on the wealthy and closed corporate tax loopholes [5]. The Revenue Act of 1935, sometimes called the “Wealth Tax Act,” raised taxes on the wealthy again: “The top rate jumped from 59 percent on incomes over $1 million to 75 percent on incomes over $500,000”; it “placed graduated net income taxes on corporations and a tax on incorporated dividends”; and it once again raised estate taxes [6]. The Revenue Act of 1936 taxed undistributed corporate profits and the Revenue Act of 1937 aimed to clamp down on corporate tax avoidance [7]. The Revenue Act of 1940 – by which time national defense spending was ramping up – raised taxes on corporations by 1%; increased taxes on incomes between $6,000 and $100,000; and lowered personal exemptions by 20%, thereby broadening the tax base [8]."
Some commentators have argued that increased taxation on high incomes and wealth during the New Deal era were not overly successful in raising additional revenue [9]. Nevertheless, in its report on fiscal year (FY) 1936, the U.S. Treasury reported an additional $321 million in income tax receipts (a 29% increase from FY 1935) and an additional $78 million in estate tax receipts (a 56% increase). The Treasury noted that these increases were not only the result of the economic recovery, but also “the full effect of the Revenue Act of 1934” [10].
Revenue rose again in FY 1937, and the Treasury noted “[it was] the largest increase recorded since receipts began to rise in the fiscal year 1933… [G]ains were widespread among the numerous sources of revenue, [and] the rise in income tax receipts, including back taxes and excess-profit taxes, was especially marked… [T]he large augmentation of receipts from these sources is ascribable both to the higher levels of income in 1935 and 1936 and to the sundry features of the Revenue Act of 1936, such as increases in rate scales, imposition of surtaxes on undistributed profits, and subjection of dividends to the normal tax” [11].
Overall, from FY 1933 through FY 1941, annual federal receipts (excluding Social Security contributions) rose 262%, from $2.1 billion to $7.6 billion [12]. Although this increase was largely due to a rapidly growing economy and higher total national income, higher taxes on the rich and corporations were significant contributors to the revenue mix.
Federal taxes were the most progressive in U.S. history after the New Deal (for example, top marginal income tax rates were 91% from 1954 through 1963) and remained so through the postwar golden age of U.S. economic dominance [13]. Rates have been whittled down in the modern era, especially under presidents Kennedy, Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump. Not surprisingly, the national debt has soared alongside these persistently low tax rates [14].
https://livingnewdeal.org/glossary/income-and-wealth-taxes-1934-1941/
Fyi, DMA as war bonds, já existiam desde a 1 guerra mundial e nos EUA eram as liberty bonds. Continuam a existir, mas vão mudando de nome e são um investimento popular entre a classe média.