LinoMarques
Well-known member
Vê-se bem a falta que as portas fazem como elemento estruturante da carroçaria...
Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap- 10/10/2026
- Iniciador de tópicos GTTDI
- Data de início
Enquanto o IIHS considera que o resultado, crash test do novo Audi Q7 é extensível ao Q8 o NHTSA, testou o Q8
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/nhtsa-awards-5-star-rating-to-the-2019-audi-q8-133355.html
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/nhtsa-awards-5-star-rating-to-the-2019-audi-q8-133355.html
Anexos
Última edição:
Renault Arkana crash test-Russia Ncap/ARCAP
https://autoreview.ru/arcap
To a maximum of 16 points, she did not get even a little, only 0.2 points. The fine is associated with a slight excess of safe loads on the shins of the driver and passenger. But even in this case, the risk of injury is low! The cabin cage is durable, the airbags and belts with pretensioners and force limiters are perfectly calibrated for a displaced frontal impact of 64 km / h, and the safety of the front panel and steering column cover is proved during additional tests. As a result, Arkana with the result of 15.8 points is second only to Solaris with its 16 points in our rating.
https://autoreview.ru/arcap
To a maximum of 16 points, she did not get even a little, only 0.2 points. The fine is associated with a slight excess of safe loads on the shins of the driver and passenger. But even in this case, the risk of injury is low! The cabin cage is durable, the airbags and belts with pretensioners and force limiters are perfectly calibrated for a displaced frontal impact of 64 km / h, and the safety of the front panel and steering column cover is proved during additional tests. As a result, Arkana with the result of 15.8 points is second only to Solaris with its 16 points in our rating.
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Após décadas e décadas de experiências com porcos é que estes gajos acordaram para a vida! Grandes defensores dos animais, sim senhor!! [
]
https://www.dn.pt/vida-e-futuro/tes...ou-ficam-gravemente-feridos-11471150.html?n=1
]https://www.dn.pt/vida-e-futuro/tes...ou-ficam-gravemente-feridos-11471150.html?n=1
Após décadas e décadas de experiências com porcos é que estes gajos acordaram para a vida! Grandes defensores dos animais, sim senhor!! [
https://www.dn.pt/vida-e-futuro/tes...ou-ficam-gravemente-feridos-11471150.html?n=1
E cadaveres
Novidades Outubro/Novembro 2019
IIHS
The 2019 Ford Edge qualifies for a Top Safety Pick award when equipped with specific headlights, becoming the first model from the brand to qualify for a 2019 award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/ford-brand-earns-its-first-2019-safety-award
Global Ncap
Parece que um dejá vu, da altura em que o EUroncap testou pela primeira vez os utilitários.
Só duas e trÊs estrelas
Suzuki Maruti Ertiga
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SuzukiMARUTIERTIGA.pdf
The Ertiga achieved three stars for adult occupant protection and three stars for child occupant protection. The Ertiga offers two frontal airbags as standard. Its structure was rated as a borderline unstable performance which can and should be improved. Its footwell area was rated as unstable and pedals displacement showed risks to the lower legs of the driver. Head and neck protection for adult occupants was good. Chest protection for passenger was good and driver chest received marginal protection. The passenger pretensioner failed to work properly. Child occupant protection showed poor results for the 18 month old dummy with the CRS installed forward facing while global best practice indicates a rearward facing position offers better protection for this age group. The Ertiga offers standard ISOFIX anchorages. Overall, the Ertiga achieved three stars for child occupant protection. The Ertiga offers standard two Seat Belt Reminders (SBR) in the front seats. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts for all occupants.
Suzuki Maruti WagonR
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SuzukiWAGONR.pdf
The WagonR achieved two stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The WagonR offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable and pedal displacement showed some risk to the lower legs of the driver. Head protection for adult occupants was good. Neck protection for driver was good and adequate for passenger. Chest protection was weak for both front passengers leading to limitations in the SBR points achieved by this model. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly for the 3 year old dummy as its Child Restraint System (CRS) broke during the impact and the head impacted the front seat. Chest protection for the 18month old dummy was low despite being installed rearward facing.
The WagonR offers standard two SBR in the front seats but its points were not considered for the final rating as the front passenger chest received weak protection. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts for all occupants.
Hyundai Santro
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HyundaiSANTRO.pdf
The Santro achieved two stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The Santro offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable. Head and neck protection for adult occupants was good. Chest protection was weak for the driver and marginal for the passenger leading to a limitation of the SBR points achieved by this model for the driver. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly because the manufacturers did not recommend a CRS for the test. The dynamic performance was poor as the head of the 3 year old showed contact during the impact. There was limited protection for the 3 year old neck while the 18 month old received acceptable protection. The Santro offers standard driver SBR but its points were not considered for the final rating as the chest of the driver received weak protection. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 points belts for all occupants.
Datsun RediGO
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/DatsunREDIGO.pdf
The RediGo achieved just one star for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The RediGo offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable. Head protection for driver was adequate due to steering wheel displacements. Head protection for passenger was good. Driver and passenger neck protection was good. Chest protection was poor for the driver and marginal for the passenger. The poor protection of the driver chest means that there is a high probability of life threatening injuries. Poor protection for any of the critical body regions, in this case the chest, limits the star rating to one star for the adults. The RediGo does not offer SBR in the front seats and, even if it had, the result would remain a single star. SBR points are limited as the chest is brown or red. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly because of the contact of the head of the 18 month old with the front seat and for the exposed head of the 3 year old dummy during the impact. The static rear 3 point belts created difficulties in the proper and safe installation of a CRS. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts with automatic retractors for all occupants.
LAtin Ncap
Dacia DUster 2019
https://www.latinncap.com/po/resultado/134/renault-new-duster-+-2-airbags
Nem no Latin Ncap cujos protocolos ao, mais suaves do que os do EUroncap o Duster consegue obter as 5 estrelas.
Se no mercado Europeu a versão Europeu fica pelas 4 estrelas, em linha com alguns concorrentes que apenas são 5 estrelas graças, aos pontos referentes À componente da segurança ativa, aqui uma versão com menos equipamento,e com soluções de engenharia (?) mais simples, conforme se verificou nos testes de outros renaults, quando comparado com as vesões Europeias nos testes do EUroncap, apresenta dificuldades no impacto lateral, coisa que não se verificou no teste do euroncap.
Seat Terraco
https://www.latinncap.com/po/resultado/133/seat-tarraco-+-7-airbags
Ao contrario da Renault, a Seat não descrimina em termos de construção, segurança ativa e passiva, os clientes europeus dos sul americanos.
IIHS
The 2019 Ford Edge qualifies for a Top Safety Pick award when equipped with specific headlights, becoming the first model from the brand to qualify for a 2019 award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/ford-brand-earns-its-first-2019-safety-award
Global Ncap
Parece que um dejá vu, da altura em que o EUroncap testou pela primeira vez os utilitários.
Só duas e trÊs estrelas
Suzuki Maruti Ertiga
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SuzukiMARUTIERTIGA.pdf
The Ertiga achieved three stars for adult occupant protection and three stars for child occupant protection. The Ertiga offers two frontal airbags as standard. Its structure was rated as a borderline unstable performance which can and should be improved. Its footwell area was rated as unstable and pedals displacement showed risks to the lower legs of the driver. Head and neck protection for adult occupants was good. Chest protection for passenger was good and driver chest received marginal protection. The passenger pretensioner failed to work properly. Child occupant protection showed poor results for the 18 month old dummy with the CRS installed forward facing while global best practice indicates a rearward facing position offers better protection for this age group. The Ertiga offers standard ISOFIX anchorages. Overall, the Ertiga achieved three stars for child occupant protection. The Ertiga offers standard two Seat Belt Reminders (SBR) in the front seats. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts for all occupants.
Suzuki Maruti WagonR
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SuzukiWAGONR.pdf
The WagonR achieved two stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The WagonR offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable and pedal displacement showed some risk to the lower legs of the driver. Head protection for adult occupants was good. Neck protection for driver was good and adequate for passenger. Chest protection was weak for both front passengers leading to limitations in the SBR points achieved by this model. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly for the 3 year old dummy as its Child Restraint System (CRS) broke during the impact and the head impacted the front seat. Chest protection for the 18month old dummy was low despite being installed rearward facing.
The WagonR offers standard two SBR in the front seats but its points were not considered for the final rating as the front passenger chest received weak protection. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts for all occupants.
Hyundai Santro
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HyundaiSANTRO.pdf
The Santro achieved two stars for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The Santro offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable. Head and neck protection for adult occupants was good. Chest protection was weak for the driver and marginal for the passenger leading to a limitation of the SBR points achieved by this model for the driver. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly because the manufacturers did not recommend a CRS for the test. The dynamic performance was poor as the head of the 3 year old showed contact during the impact. There was limited protection for the 3 year old neck while the 18 month old received acceptable protection. The Santro offers standard driver SBR but its points were not considered for the final rating as the chest of the driver received weak protection. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 points belts for all occupants.
Datsun RediGO
http://www.globalncap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/DatsunREDIGO.pdf
The RediGo achieved just one star for adult occupant protection and two stars for child occupant protection. The RediGo offers only a driver frontal airbag as standard. Its structure was rated as unstable. Its footwell area was rated as unstable. Head protection for driver was adequate due to steering wheel displacements. Head protection for passenger was good. Driver and passenger neck protection was good. Chest protection was poor for the driver and marginal for the passenger. The poor protection of the driver chest means that there is a high probability of life threatening injuries. Poor protection for any of the critical body regions, in this case the chest, limits the star rating to one star for the adults. The RediGo does not offer SBR in the front seats and, even if it had, the result would remain a single star. SBR points are limited as the chest is brown or red. Child occupant protection showed poor results mainly because of the contact of the head of the 18 month old with the front seat and for the exposed head of the 3 year old dummy during the impact. The static rear 3 point belts created difficulties in the proper and safe installation of a CRS. It is surprising that this car is not offering 3 point belts with automatic retractors for all occupants.
LAtin Ncap
Dacia DUster 2019
https://www.latinncap.com/po/resultado/134/renault-new-duster-+-2-airbags
Nem no Latin Ncap cujos protocolos ao, mais suaves do que os do EUroncap o Duster consegue obter as 5 estrelas.
Se no mercado Europeu a versão Europeu fica pelas 4 estrelas, em linha com alguns concorrentes que apenas são 5 estrelas graças, aos pontos referentes À componente da segurança ativa, aqui uma versão com menos equipamento,e com soluções de engenharia (?) mais simples, conforme se verificou nos testes de outros renaults, quando comparado com as vesões Europeias nos testes do EUroncap, apresenta dificuldades no impacto lateral, coisa que não se verificou no teste do euroncap.
Seat Terraco
https://www.latinncap.com/po/resultado/133/seat-tarraco-+-7-airbags
Ao contrario da Renault, a Seat não descrimina em termos de construção, segurança ativa e passiva, os clientes europeus dos sul americanos.
Última edição:
Estas últimas alterações que fizeream no layout do Forum, não permitem efetuar copy paste das imagens. Este é um tipo de tópico que perde com isso. Há alguma forma de contornar essa situação? Como faço para uqe as fotos fiquem visíveis sem ter que, utilizar o photbucket?
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Não podes. []
Já agora, eu uso o www.picr.de e é da coisas mais fáceis e rápidas de usar. Recomendo vivamente. [
]
]Já agora, eu uso o www.picr.de e é da coisas mais fáceis e rápidas de usar. Recomendo vivamente. [
]
Última edição:
IIHS 2017 BUick Verano Crash test (Opel Astra J)
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/buick/verano-4-door-sedan/2017
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/buick/verano-4-door-sedan/2017
Anexos
Última edição:
Buick Lacross/Opel Insignia B
IIHS
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/buick/lacrosse-4-door-sedan/2019
NHTSA
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2019/BUICK/LACROSSE/4%2520DR/FWD
IIHS
https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/buick/lacrosse-4-door-sedan/2019
NHTSA
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2019/BUICK/LACROSSE/4%2520DR/FWD
Última edição:
Segundo este video, os proximos carros cujos resultados serão publicados pelo Euroncap são;
Ford Explorer
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLB
Opel Corsa
Mazda 3
Segundo o que vem no Twitter, eram para ser testados apenas 4 carros, mas houve um cujo teste foi alterado para outra data, sendo agora publicado
Euro NCAP @EuroNCAP
NOTA: Nao deve ser o Mazda 3 pois, este ja foi testado, tendo obtido um resultado praticamente perfeito logo, não há à primeira vista razao para ser testados novamente. Provavelmente será o Mazda 2 restyling
Em resposta a @subogubo6
Correct... But one car was rescheduled
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192381749961072640
Wednesday 13 November 10:00 AM CET.
Ford Explorer
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLB
Opel Corsa
Mazda 3
Segundo o que vem no Twitter, eram para ser testados apenas 4 carros, mas houve um cujo teste foi alterado para outra data, sendo agora publicado
Euro NCAP @EuroNCAP
NOTA: Nao deve ser o Mazda 3 pois, este ja foi testado, tendo obtido um resultado praticamente perfeito logo, não há à primeira vista razao para ser testados novamente. Provavelmente será o Mazda 2 restyling
Em resposta a @subogubo6
Correct... But one car was rescheduled
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192381749961072640
Wednesday 13 November 10:00 AM CET.
Última edição:
Atualmente o pilar A dos automóveis é muito mais robusto e inclinado, o que confere aquela zona uma resistência imensamente superior.
Naqueles tempos, bater de frente era uma certidão de óbito para o condutor.
A maior deformação do Scorpio deve-se, à maior altura do Pajero em relação ao Ford que é atingido numa zona mais fragil?
Arrisco a dizer que, as maiores deformações evidenciadas pelo Scorpio devem-se a trÊs fatores
Maior altura do Pajero
Maior peso do Pajero
O facto do Pajero não ser monobloco, isto é, o Scorpio atinge o Pajero numa longarina
Neste video verifica-se que o Scorpio consegue, mante ruma certa rigidez estrutural, não conseguindo contudo evitar, uma elevada intrusão no habitaculo da coluna de direção na linha dos seus concorrentes, como o Rrenault 25 e Oepl Omega, por exemplo.
Última edição:
Tesla Modell 3
NHTSA
5*
Tesla’s crash rating is buoyed by the absence of an internal combustion engine. For instance, without a motor in the hood, there’s more room for a forward crumple zone. Tesla vehicles also tend to be resistant to rollovers because the battery pack is located at the bottom of the vehicle, giving it a low center of gravity. The risk of a rollover in a Tesla Model 3 is 6.6 percent, according to NHTSA.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2018/TESLA/MODEL%25203/4%2520DR/RWD
NHTSA
5*
Tesla’s crash rating is buoyed by the absence of an internal combustion engine. For instance, without a motor in the hood, there’s more room for a forward crumple zone. Tesla vehicles also tend to be resistant to rollovers because the battery pack is located at the bottom of the vehicle, giving it a low center of gravity. The risk of a rollover in a Tesla Model 3 is 6.6 percent, according to NHTSA.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2018/TESLA/MODEL%25203/4%2520DR/RWD
NHTSA Tesla Model X crash test
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2019/TESLA/MODEL%2520X%2520P100D/SUV/AWD
5*
The Tesla Model X became the first-ever SUV to earn a 5-star safety rating across the board from the federal safety agency.
In its company blog, Tesla today announced that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gave the Model X a 5-star safety rating in every category and subcategory covered during its independent testing.
The company said that the Model X represents the lowest probability of injury for any SUV ever tested. In the context of all vehicles the federal agency has ever tested, the Model X’s overall probability of injury was second only to the Model S, according to Tesla.
Tesla thinks that having to protect the battery pack during the design phase helped it surmount the controversial issue of the SUV potentially rolling over. The large battery pack had to be mounted beneath the floor of the SUV, creating a center of gravity so low it gives the Model X the lowest rollover probability of any SUV on the road.
“No other SUV has ever come close to meeting and exceeding this rollover requirement,” Tesla said.
The nine subcategories tested by NHTSA included frontal impact, side impact, and pole impact. Testing also explored intrusion into the cabin and how energy is absorbed during a crash; and how well the seatbelt and airbag systems work.
Tesla said that gaining 5-star ratings in all categories and subcategories means that Model X passengers have an overall 93 percent probability of avoiding a serious injury from the crash.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2019/TESLA/MODEL%2520X%2520P100D/SUV/AWD
5*
The Tesla Model X became the first-ever SUV to earn a 5-star safety rating across the board from the federal safety agency.
In its company blog, Tesla today announced that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gave the Model X a 5-star safety rating in every category and subcategory covered during its independent testing.
The company said that the Model X represents the lowest probability of injury for any SUV ever tested. In the context of all vehicles the federal agency has ever tested, the Model X’s overall probability of injury was second only to the Model S, according to Tesla.
Tesla thinks that having to protect the battery pack during the design phase helped it surmount the controversial issue of the SUV potentially rolling over. The large battery pack had to be mounted beneath the floor of the SUV, creating a center of gravity so low it gives the Model X the lowest rollover probability of any SUV on the road.
“No other SUV has ever come close to meeting and exceeding this rollover requirement,” Tesla said.
The nine subcategories tested by NHTSA included frontal impact, side impact, and pole impact. Testing also explored intrusion into the cabin and how energy is absorbed during a crash; and how well the seatbelt and airbag systems work.
Tesla said that gaining 5-star ratings in all categories and subcategories means that Model X passengers have an overall 93 percent probability of avoiding a serious injury from the crash.
LinoMarques
Well-known member
Crash test MOrgan Aero 8
Crash Test Dummy - Talk Morgan - Morgan Sports Car Discussion Forum, Community and News
Crash Test Dummy - Talk Morgan - Morgan Sports Car Discussion Forum, Community and News