Topico dos Crash-Tests ⚠️Euroncap- 10/10/2026

[Fabulous]

Esse Opel Sintra utilizava uma plataforma oriunda do final dos anos 80. Acho que só vi um em Portugal.

 

[GTTDI]

Ford Transit Crash Test

 

[GTTDI]

Euroncap-8/9/2021

Subaru Outback 2021 5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/subaru/outback/43500

Audi Q4-e Tron-5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/audi/q4-e-tron/43490

Toyota Mirai-5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/toyota/mirai/43501

Nio ES8
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/nio/es8/43499

Lynk e Co 01 2021-5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/lynk-&-co/01/43498

 

[LinoMarques]

(Mais) um teste interessante do ADAC sobre sistemas de retenção adaptativos para diferentes estaturas e até idades:

https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrze..._medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=kor_redaktion

 

[GTTDI]

2021 Toyota Yaris Cross ANCAP crash test
https://www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/toyota/yaris-cross/154c9a

 

[GTTDI]

2021 Tesla Model Y Receives 5 Stars in NHTSA Crash Test sunilsangleJanuary 19, 2021 The Tesla Model Y is currently the cheapest SUV in Tesla’s portfolio. Recently, I received a perfect score in the NHTSA crash test. Tesla will step into the Indian market. Meanwhile, Tesla also received good news from one of its EVs. The most affordable Tesla SUV in the global lineup, the Model Y received a five-star rating in the NHTSA Crash Test (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). Even more impressive, the Tesla Model Y is also the SUV with the lowest risk of rollover in the history of NHTSA crash testing. For those who don’t know. NHTSA operates as an agency of the United States Federal Government and belongs to the Ministry of Transport. NHTSA has played an important role in promoting and promoting vehicle safety levels. The agency started the NCAP crash test in 1979. During the NHTSA crash test, the vehicle uses a variety of components such as head-on collisions, side collisions, and rollover tests. Tesla Y’s success in this safety test is due to its solid architecture that underpins another five-star Tesla model, the Tesla Model 3.

In Model Y, this advanced architecture is designed to dictate collision forces throughout the cabin, thus reducing the risk to car occupants. In addition, by equipping the front and rear with crushable zones, the effects of car accidents are effectively reduced. Tesla Model Y got the highest score in the NHTSA crash test High rollover risk is a relatively common problem among SUVs. However, according to crash test reports, the Tesla Model Y also recorded a very low rollover risk of only 7.9%. It is also the lowest ever SUV tested by NHTSA. Such a low rollover risk can be due to a lower center of gravity due to the heavy electric motor and battery pack being closer to the ground. In addition to all structural attributes, the Tesla Model Y also features advanced safety technologies such as emergency braking, lane departure warning, and forward collision warning. It has previously been reported that an American electric vehicle brand has registered an office in Bangalore. According to the report, the Tesla Model 3 is expected to be the first Tesla car to debut in India. Given the current growing popularity of SUVs in our market, Tesla may consider launching the Model Y at a later stage.

https://www.google.com/search?q=202...w&biw=1366&bih=615&dpr=1#imgrc=W_WQ8nZ9XmPiGM

 

[GTTDI]

[h=1]BMW Serie 3 crash test
02, e21, e30, e36, e46 crash test and comparison from BMW[/h]https://www.rtsauto.com/02-e21-e30-e36-e46-crash-test-and-comparison-from-bmw/

 

[Kijk]

Como é que a linha azul é melhor que a verde? Não são os Gs sofridos a medida principal de severidade? Qual o interesse da deformação?

 

[LinoMarques]

Regra geral, uma menor deformação implica maior rigidez e, por isso, maior desaceleração. Mas isso não é totalmente linear.

 

[Kijk]

Regra geral, uma menor deformação implica maior rigidez e, por isso, maior desaceleração. Mas isso não é totalmente linear.

Mas isso já está reflectido na linha dos Gs...

 

[nto]

https://www.motor1.com/news/543607/mach-e-ioniq-euro-ncap/






.

 

[GTTDI]

Euroncap Outubro de 2021

Hyundai Baion 4*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/hyundai/bayon/43817

Toyota Yaris Cross
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/toyota/yaris-cross/43819

Hyundai Tucson 5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/hyundai/tucson/43815

Hyundai Ioniq 5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/hyundai/ioniq-5/43813

Ford Mustang Mach-E 5*
https://www.euroncap.com/en/results/ford/mustang-mach-e/43812

 

[GTTDI]

https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/small-suvs-struggle-in-new-tougher-side-test

he Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is introducing a new, tougher side crash test to address higher-speed crashes that continue to cause fatalities. In the first tests of 2020-21 vehicles, only one out of 20 small SUVs, the 2021 Mazda CX-5, earns a good rating.

Nine vehicles earn acceptable ratings: the Audi Q3, Buick Encore, Chevrolet Trax, Honda CR-V, Nissan Rogue, Subaru Forester, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Venza and Volvo XC40.
Eight others — the Chevrolet Equinox, Ford Escape, GMC Terrain, Hyundai Tucson, Jeep Compass, Jeep Renegade, Kia Sportage and Lincoln Corsair — earn marginal ratings. Two more, the Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, receive poor ratings.
All but one of the tested vehicles was a 2021 model. Mitsubishi skipped the 2021 model year for the Eclipse Cross, so the 2020 model was tested. With the exception of the Compass and the Tucson, the ratings carry over to 2022 models.
“Obviously, these results aren’t great, but they’re in line with what we expected when we adopted this more stringent test,” says IIHS Senior Research Engineer Becky Mueller, whose research formed the foundation for the new test protocol.

 

[LinoMarques]

Já era realmente altura de aumentar a severidade dos testes laterais, mais que os frontais. apr

 

[GTTDI]

Este teste do Safrane já é conhecido mas consegui encontrar, uma reportagem em que incluem os valores dos ferimentos.
Pena o teste ser diferente do da AMS e por isso, nao ser possível comparar com as 8 berlinas testadas pela AMS.

O mais preocupante sã os valores obtidos ao nível do torax dos ocupantes da frente, que estão próximos do limite

 

[GTTDI]

https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/small-suvs-struggle-in-new-tougher-side-test

he Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is introducing a new, tougher side crash test to address higher-speed crashes that continue to cause fatalities. In the first tests of 2020-21 vehicles, only one out of 20 small SUVs, the 2021 Mazda CX-5, earns a good rating.

Nine vehicles earn acceptable ratings: the Audi Q3, Buick Encore, Chevrolet Trax, Honda CR-V, Nissan Rogue, Subaru Forester, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Venza and Volvo XC40.
Eight others — the Chevrolet Equinox, Ford Escape, GMC Terrain, Hyundai Tucson, Jeep Compass, Jeep Renegade, Kia Sportage and Lincoln Corsair — earn marginal ratings. Two more, the Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, receive poor ratings.
All but one of the tested vehicles was a 2021 model. Mitsubishi skipped the 2021 model year for the Eclipse Cross, so the 2020 model was tested. With the exception of the Compass and the Tucson, the ratings carry over to 2022 models.
“Obviously, these results aren’t great, but they’re in line with what we expected when we adopted this more stringent test,” says IIHS Senior Research Engineer Becky Mueller, whose research formed the foundation for the new test protocol.

To address those crashes, the updated side test uses a heavier barrier traveling at a higher speed to simulate the striking vehicle. The new barrier weighs 4,180 pounds — close to the weight of today’s midsize SUVs — and strikes the test vehicle at 37 mph, compared with a 3,300-pound barrier traveling at 31 mph in the original evaluation. Together, those two changes mean it involves 82 percent more energy.

The honeycomb striking surface of the new barrier also has a different design that acts more like a real SUV or pickup when it hits another vehicle.


Resultados
https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/small-suvs-struggle-in-new-tougher-side-test

2021-22 Mazda CX-5 good
2021-22 Audi Q3 Average
2021-22 Buick Encore/Opel Mokka I Average
2021-22 Chevrolet Trax Average
2021-22 Honda CR-V Average
2021-22 Nissan Rogue Average
2021-22 Subaru Forester Average
2021-22 Toyota RAV4 Average
2021-22 Volvo XC40 Average
2021-22 Chevrolet Equinox Marginal
2021-22 Ford Escape/Kuga II Marginal
2021-22 GMC Terrain Marginal
2021 Hyundai Tucson Marginal
2021 Jeep Compas Marginal
2021-22 Jeep Renegade Marginal
2021-22 Kia Sportage Marginal
2021-22 Lincoln Corsair Marginal
2021-22 Honda HR-V Marginal

 

[LinoMarques]

Este teste do Safrane já é conhecido mas consegui encontrar, uma reportagem em que incluem os valores dos ferimentos.
Pena o teste ser diferente do da AMS e por isso, nao ser possível comparar com as 8 berlinas testadas pela AMS.

O mais preocupante são os valores obtidos ao nível do torax dos ocupantes da frente, que estão próximos do limite

Acho que a revista francesa L'Action Automobile também trazia os valores, não?

 

[GTTDI]

Acho que a revista francesa L'Action Automobile também trazia os valores, não?

Penso que não. Por isso dei 6 euros por esta revista.

Interessante a análise dos ferimentos que a AutoHebado fez, dos crash test do segmento do Saab 900
Nas publicações da AMS todos com excepção do Audi A4 têm, pernas amarelas.

Não fazia ideia que o Serie 3 Compact e que o Mondeo eram mais seguros, do que o Mercedes Classe C e que o Saab 900

 

[GTTDI]

 

[GTTDI]

[h=1]Tata Punch achieves 5 star rating for adult protection[/h]https://www.globalncap.org/news/tata-punch-achieves-5-star-rating-for-adult-protection-in-voluntary-test