citação:
Originalmente colocada por Prelude
citação:Originalmente colocada por PLAYBRAGA
Caro PRELUDE sem dúvida que a melhor opção é um IWC ( O PORTUGUESA RESERVA DE MARCHA 7 DIAS é fantástico) .Quanto ao BULGARY que adquiriu, acho um relógio muito caro para o calibre que vem incorporado, além de a BULGARY nao ser uma marca relojoeira( mas nao deixa de ser um relógio que confere um status elevado).
Aproveito para referir que trabalho á vários anos no sector relojoeiro , se puder ajudar em alguma questão disponha.
Obrigado pela sua ajuda, talvez venha mesmo a precisar
Por curiosidade ate 2000 euros que relogio adquiria?
Quanto ao IWC que refere o seu elevado preco (cerca de 7500 euros) sao um "entrave" a sua aquisicao de momento, no entanto e o meu modelo preferido, quando o tinha nas maos ja nao o queria largar, amor a primeira vista [B)]
Em relacao a BVLGARI

, e originalmente uma empresa de joalharia, no entanto o seu primeiro relogio surgiu em 1920 e comecaou a producao em 1940. Ao comprar a Daniel Roth e Gerald Genta permitiu a Bvlgari comecar a criar pecas de alta relojoaria tendo criado o seu proprio movimento Tourbillon.
Quanto ao movimento ETA 2892-A2 todas as criticas que tenho lido teem sido muito positivas, sendo considerado um movimento preciso e muito fiavel, no entanto nao sou "expert" na materia.
Aqui ficam alguns textos e os seus links para o movimento ETA 2892-A2:
Personally, I am amazed that ETA can produce such a thin movement as the 2892-A2 and not only make it as sturdy and as reliable as their thicker movements, but as I mentioned earlier if there is a more accurate or reliable movement than this, I haven’t seen it.
The Proud, the Few, the Accurate
So which movements meet my criteria? This short list of outstanding movements should all easily achieve a daily consistency of five seconds or better on the wrist. Those people wanting better accuracy than that, will be much happier with a thermo or radio controlled quartz watch.
Of those currently in production, I’d list the ETA 2892-A2, ETA 2824/2, ETA 7750, JLC 889/2 (and its variations by other brands), JLC 960, all of the current Rolex calibers, Longines 990 (Lemania 8815), PP 215, PP 240, Zenith 400. This is a very small list, I know, mainly because there are many fine movements with which I have very little, or no experience at all. L.U.C. Parmigiani etc.
Some movements that I’ve found delivered excellent timing, but I’m reluctant to put them into the above category because I’ve only serviced/timed one or two of them. FP 1180, FP 1150, Lange 901.0, Omega 2500, Zenith 670, GP 3100.
My experience has been that the ones that have the nicest quality finish are Breitling, Cartier GP/Bulgari 220, Frank Muller 2800 , IWC’s 375XX and the Ulysse Nardin
http://www.chronometrie.com/eta2824/eta2824.html
So how does it compare to the competition? There are some movements that match it in terms of accuracy and reliability, but in my humble opinion, none exceed it. The Rolex 3035 and 3135 match it toe to toe. But they are a lot thicker and considerably more expensive too. The PPs, while being very pretty to look at, do not match it for accuracy and are more delicate as far as reliability is concerned. Of course they’re also slightly thinner, so that does put them at a disadvantage. The JLC 889/2 does match it for accuracy, but is also too delicate to give it any competition in the reliability department. The main reason for the latter is its very weak mainspring. The whole design, while being well thought out and superbly executed, relies too much on everything being just perfect. It is just thrown out of wack too easily, when even minor things go out of adjustment. I don’t have too much experience on the Blancpain/Piguet movements. But from the few that have crossed my bench, they don’t seem to deliver the same accuracy that the 2892 has no trouble delivering. Let me know if I’ve left any of your favorite movements out, and I’ll gladly comment on them.
An indepth look at the ETA 2892
http://www.chronometrie.com/eta2892/eta2892.html
Cumprimentos