ShakesBeer
New member
Já encostou o Ed Force One:
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/ir...badly-damaged-in-1764531110?rev=1457817592701
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/ir...badly-damaged-in-1764531110?rev=1457817592701
Parece que os problemas com os motores do A320 Neo nunca ficaram resolvidos:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lufthansa-results-a-idUSKCN0WJ1YY
Lufthansa says A320neo engine improving but not there yet
FRANKFURT
![]()
Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr addresses a news conference at the company's headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, March 17, 2016.
Reuters/Kai Pfaffenbach
Lufthansa (LHAG.DE) said issues with the new engine of its A320neo plane are not fully fixed and as a result it was not ready to put more of the revamped Airbus jets into commercial service.
"The engine issues are slowly improving, we're not there yet, that's why we have not agreed to take the second aircraft into the fleet," Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr said after the German carrier reported annual results on Thursday.
Plane manufacturer Airbus (AIR.PA) missed an end-2015 target for the first delivery of the new version of its best-selling plane after it was found the engines, made by UTC's Pratt & Whitney (UTX.N), needed longer than usual to start properly.
Lufthansa, which stepped in as the first operator when Qatar Airways refused to take the plane, took delivery of its first A320neo in January.
For now, the jet is only flying on routes within Germany, where Lufthansa has a large base of engineers at its maintenance division.
"We could fly to other places but we would need more engineers in those locations," Spohr said.
He said the German carrier was receiving compensation from Airbus until it could make full use of the A320neo and that the jet was showing a 20 percent reduction in costs compared with the earlier model.
Software issues, where the engine sends erroneous messages to the cockpit, are also about 50 percent resolved, Spohr said.
Pratt & Whitney said this month the new geared turbofan jetliner engine had logged high reliability at Lufthansa and that it was delivering software and hardware fixes.
Lufthansa is due to take delivery of 52 new planes this year, including five A320neo jets.
(Reporting by Victoria Bryan; editing by David Clarke)
Como vêm sendo hábito, vale tudo para tentar ultrapassar a concorrência.[8b]
Boeing 737 passenger jet crashes killing at least 55 passengers and crew in a fireball at a Russian airport
Parece que os problemas com os motores do A320 Neo nunca ficaram resolvidos:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lufthansa-results-a-idUSKCN0WJ1YY
Lufthansa says A320neo engine improving but not there yet
FRANKFURT
![]()
Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr addresses a news conference at the company's headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, March 17, 2016.
Reuters/Kai Pfaffenbach
Lufthansa (LHAG.DE) said issues with the new engine of its A320neo plane are not fully fixed and as a result it was not ready to put more of the revamped Airbus jets into commercial service.
"The engine issues are slowly improving, we're not there yet, that's why we have not agreed to take the second aircraft into the fleet," Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr said after the German carrier reported annual results on Thursday.
Plane manufacturer Airbus (AIR.PA) missed an end-2015 target for the first delivery of the new version of its best-selling plane after it was found the engines, made by UTC's Pratt & Whitney (UTX.N), needed longer than usual to start properly.
Lufthansa, which stepped in as the first operator when Qatar Airways refused to take the plane, took delivery of its first A320neo in January.
For now, the jet is only flying on routes within Germany, where Lufthansa has a large base of engineers at its maintenance division.
"We could fly to other places but we would need more engineers in those locations," Spohr said.
He said the German carrier was receiving compensation from Airbus until it could make full use of the A320neo and that the jet was showing a 20 percent reduction in costs compared with the earlier model.
Software issues, where the engine sends erroneous messages to the cockpit, are also about 50 percent resolved, Spohr said.
Pratt & Whitney said this month the new geared turbofan jetliner engine had logged high reliability at Lufthansa and that it was delivering software and hardware fixes.
Lufthansa is due to take delivery of 52 new planes this year, including five A320neo jets.
(Reporting by Victoria Bryan; editing by David Clarke)
Como vêm sendo hábito, vale tudo para tentar ultrapassar a concorrência.[8b]
Não percebi o comentário.
Lançar o avião no mercado antes dos concorrentes sem terem resolvido os problemas (não é a primeira vez na Airbus nem a ùnica), para os poder ultrapassar. A Qatar nunca quis receber os deles, porque será?
Não é um problema exclusivo da Airbus.
Lançar o avião no mercado antes dos concorrentes sem terem resolvido os problemas (não é a primeira vez na Airbus nem a ùnica), para os poder ultrapassar. A Qatar nunca quis receber os deles, porque será?
Aquele boing no longo curso é espectacular. A ida uma coisa que correu mal, foi muita gente à minha volta entrou com sacos de comida do mcdonnald, fiquei mal disposto umas 2 horas por causa daquele cheiro no ar.
Pois, mas basta ver o caso do A400M e do A380, por exemplo.
E o 787...
Mas quais foram os problemas desses 2, ja agora?
A A400 já caiu um e os que estão a voar têm sido afectados por problemas de software, de qualidade e muito mais importante os problemas com os motores, já para não falar que o projecto ficou longe do prometido ao nível de capacidade de carga, peso e manobrabilidade. O A380 basta falar do problema do da Quantas e em todos os problemas encontrados durante o fabrico, para já não falar que neste momento estão a ser vendidos a valores de perto de 50% e mesmo assim ninguém (além da Emirates) os quer.
O 787 é um projecto completamente diferente de qualquer avião (até ao nível de sistemas de controlo de voo que são eléctricos em vez de hidráulicos) e por isso a acumulação de atrasos e alterações no seu projecto (mesmo assim inferior ao atraso do A400m) e o seu maior problema não têm nada a haver com o avião, mas sim com a utilização de baterias de iões de lítio (que actualmente já fizeram cair pelo menos 2 aviões de carga e que actualmente são proibidas em qualquer porão de carga de voos comerciais), mas está a voar e com bons indices de rentabilidade.
Então com a Airbus caiu um e o problema é da empresa, mas com a Boeing caíram 2 e o problema é das baterias?
Quais 2 é que caíram da Boeing (por acaso até foram 2 Boeing, mas foi um 747 e um MD-11 e foi por fogo no compartimento de carga que foi provocado por baterias transportadas)? Ao menos lestes o que eu escrevi?